Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mohd. Guddu v. Ganga Devi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's jurisdiction and possession decree in a commercial tenancy dispute, modifying the decree to allow continued occupation till June 2026 with payment of arrears, while remanding disputed issues for trial.
Pranij Heights India Pvt Ltd v. The Joint Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that non-communication of an extension order under Section 28(9) of the Customs Act does not vitiate adjudication proceedings and dismissed the writ petition challenging delayed adjudication of a Show Cause Notice.
Manikjeet Singh Kals v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction for adjudication and appeal under the CGST Act is determined by the highest tax demand and procedural objections do not invalidate orders, directing the petitioner to pursue remedy through appeal.
Neelmani Electricals v. The Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order passed without hearing the petitioner, remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, and left open the validity of impugned GST notifications pending the Supreme Court's decision.
CDL Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Vijay Pal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into arbitrability or merits.
Rajesh & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of one appellant for causing grievous injuries under Section 308 IPC while acquitting another due to delayed implication, and modified the sentence of the convicted appellant to the period already served.
GALAX INFRA AND SPORTS v. TUNA ENVIROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into arbitrability or merits.
Anil v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction under Section 307 IPC to Section 323 IPC due to lack of intention to cause death, while upholding other convictions and reducing the sentence to the period already served.
Axis Finance Limited v. Saurav Shekhar Sinha
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator accordingly.
Krishna Murari Bangar v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal charges against a government servant alleging conspiracy to manipulate investigations, holding that judicially upheld Scheduled Tribe status and accepted closure reports preclude prosecution without sanction and material evidence.
Laxmi Rawat v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that absence of documentary proof and complainant's status as housewife do not rebut statutory presumption without credible evidence.
Union of India v. Satya Pal Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction mandating grant of revised pay scales to eligible library staff without awaiting notification of amended Recruitment Rules, dismissing the petition challenging such implementation.
M/S CONVEY TECH PROJECTS v. M/S H.P TRADING COMPANY
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act but modified the sentence by imposing a higher fine and reducing imprisonment, considering the accused's age and cheque amount.
Kedar Parsad Meena & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a noncompoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and divorce decree, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Naresh Kumar & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal case under Section 392 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the inherent power of the court to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Gagan Rathor and Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial dispute based on amicable settlement and divorce decree, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - Central -1 v. R.J. Corp. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the Finance Act 2022 amendment to Section 14A is prospective and disallowance under Section 14A must be restricted to the amount of exempt income earned during the relevant assessment year.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) v. Deepak Kumar Aggarwal
The High Court held that the six-year limitation under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act is computed from the date seized documents are handed over to the Assessing Officer, not the date of search, thereby excluding Assessment Year 2013-14 from reassessment.
Mr. Devvrat Sharma and Mr. Japneet Singh v. Arun Kumar & Anr
The court held that when a subsequent law reduces punishment, the accused is entitled to the benefit of the lesser penalty even if the offence was committed under a repealed statute.
Abdul Nasir Khatri & Anr. v. Fazlu Rehman Khatri & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application to reject the plaint in a partition suit, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and the Plaintiffs were not required to pay ad valorem court fee on their share.