Sumeet Nagpal v. Shiv Raj

Delhi High Court · 08 Dec 2015 · 2015:DHC:11916
Rajiv Shakdher
FAQ 327/2014
2015:DHC:11916
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as not pressed after the appellant received full payment under the settlement agreement and chose not to pursue the appeal further.

Full Text
Translation output
$-18 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FAQ 327/2014
SUMEETNAGPAL .....Appellant
Through:Mr.Pradeep Kumar,Advocate
VERSUS
SHIV RAJ Respondent
Through:Mr.Manohar Nagesh,Advocate
CORAM;
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
08.12.2015 The learned counsel for the appellant says that since entire money has been received under the settlement agreement dated 16.07.2015 though, aftersome delay,he has instructionsto conveyto the courtthatthe appellant does not wish to pressthe appeal any further.
The captioned appealis accordingly,dismissed as notpressed.
The appeal be consigned to record.
RAJIV SHAKDHER,J DECEMBER 08,2015 yg 2015:DHC:11916
JUDGMENT