M/S PRESIDENCY KID LEATHER PVT. LIMITED v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Delhi High Court · 08 Jan 2016 · 2016:DHC:9182
Sunil Gaur
W.P.(CI) 177/2016
2016:DHC:9182
administrative other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions challenging Provident Fund authorities' actions, emphasizing statutory compliance and procedural fairness without granting substantive relief.

Full Text
Translation output
I
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
(i)+ W.P.(CI 177/2016 & C.M. 744/2016 & 745/2016
M/S PRESIDENCY KID LEATHER PVT. LIMITED .. Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate
VERSUS
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER ....
Respondent
Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu & Mr. Madhur Sachdeva, Advocates
(ii)+ W.P.(CI 180/2016 & C.M. 747/2016 748/2016
M/S. TATA STEEL LTD. Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate
VERSUS
ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & ANR.
Respondents"
Through: Ms. InderjeetSidhu& Mr. Madhur Sachdeva, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
08.01.2016 The relief claimed in the above captioned two petitions is on similar grounds, therefore, with the consent oflearned counsel for parties, above captioned two petitions were heard together and are being disposed ofby this common order. -
W.P.CQ 177/2016 Page 1
W.P.(C) 180/2016
2016:DHC:9182 2016:DHC:9182
JUDGMENT