Sanjay Mittal v. State Govt. of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 12 Jul 2011 · 2016:DHC:9008
P. S. Teji
CRL.M.C. 96/2013 & Crl.M.A. No.410/2016
2016:DHC:9008
criminal petition_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The High Court of Delhi dismissed the criminal petition as withdrawn and later corrected the case year and party names in the order.

Full Text
Translation output
/ I - ,
JUDGMENT

1 V \ \ \ $-57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 96/2013 & Crl.M.A. No.410/2016 SANJAY MITTAL Petitioner Through Mr.Ashutosh Jha, Adv. withMr.Amar Pal, Adv.

VERSUS

STATE GOVT.

OF DELHI & ANR. Respondents Through Mr.Panna Lai Sharma, APP for the State. Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv. for R-3 to R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE P.S. TEJI ORDER % 11.01.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. On request, the petition and application are dismissed as withdrawn.

JANUARY 11, 2016 aa P.S. TEJ/1, J k — — - ©On 2016:DHC:9008 \. I $-19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 96/2016 ASHOK Petitioner Through: None.

VERSUS

STATE OF NOT OF DELHI & ORS Respondents Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, AFP for the State/R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS.

JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER % 12.07.2017

1. File has been taken up pursuant to an office note to the effect that in the order dated if" January, 2016, the year ofthe case and the name ofthe parties in the title have been mentioned incorrectly.

2. Perused the record.

3. The title ofthe order dated if' January, 2016 correcting the year of the case and the name ofthe parties be read as under:- '+ CRL.M.C. 96/2016 & Crl.M.A. No.410/2016 ASHOK Petitioner Through: Mr.Ashutosh Jha, Adv. with Mr.Amar Pal, Adv.

VERSUS

STATE OF NOT OF DELHI & ORS Respondents Through: Mr.Panna Lai Sharma, APP for the State. Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv. for R-3 to R-5.'

4. This order shall be read as part of order dated 11 January, 2016. pratibha'rani, j. JULY 12, 2011/'st'