Rakesh Kumar Sharma v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 22 Jan 2016 · 2016:DHC:529
Hima Kohli; Sunil Gaur
W.P.(C) 9848/2015
2016:DHC:529
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the respondents granted the petitioner accommodation in Delhi in compliance with Court directions.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 9848/2015 & CMs No.23747-48/2015
RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. Indra Sen Singh, Advocate
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents
Through : Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R 22.01.2016
JUDGMENT

1. Counsel for the respondents states that the petitioner had submitted a representation to his Commandant, in terms of the order dated 16.10.2015, which was directed to be decided expeditiously. Pursuant thereto, the respondents have decided the said representation by passing an order dated 28.10.2015, a copy whereof has been handed over and taken on record. She states that in terms of the said order, the petitioner has been duly accommodated in Delhi.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner confirms the aforesaid position and states that in view of the order dated 28.10.2015, nothing further survives for adjudication in the present petition. W.P.(C) 9848/2015 2016:DHC:529

3. While taking on record the order dated 28.10.2015, the present petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications. HIMA KOHLI, J SUNIL GAUR, J JANUARY 22, 2016 sk/ap