Satpal Singh v. Dr. Puneet Kumar Goel

Delhi High Court · 14 Jan 2016 · 2016:DHC:8631
J. R. Midha
CONT.CAS(C)918/2015
2016:DHC:8631
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging shop sealing as withdrawn after the shops were de-sealed by the competent authority and a compliance report was filed.

Full Text
Translation output
1/ $--8 to 11 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C)918/2015
SATPAL SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr., Dhirendra Yadav, Mr. Vijay, Mr.Manohar Nagar,Advs.
VERSUS
DRPUNEET KUMAR GOEL Respondent
Through: Mr.Ajay Digpaul,Mr.Kunal Gosain, Advs.for SDMC.
CONT.CAS(C)919/2015
SAVITRI DEVI TANEJA Petitioner
Through: Mr. Dhirendra Yadav, Mr. Vijay,
VERSUS
CONT.CAS(C)920/2015
VEENA KANDHARI Petitioner
VERSUS
CONT.CAS(C)926/2015
RAJVIR SINGH Petitioner 2016:DHC:8631 5-^
VERSUS
DRPXJNEET KUMAR GOEL Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
14.01.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the shops in question have been de-sealed by the competent authority on 11 December, 2015.
Compliance report has been filed by South Delhi Municipal Corporation.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not press these petitions in view ofthe de-sealing ofthe shops in question.
The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
J.R.MIDHA,J.
JANUARY 14,2016 dk 2016:DHC:8631
JUDGMENT