Full Text
Translation output
)
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL)1847/2009& CRL.M.A.2337/2014,4723/2015,4735/2015, 8726/2015,8288/2015,12821/2015,18874-18875/2015
ELIAMMA SEBASTAN Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manoj Taneja, Advocate (Amicus Curiae)
Petitioner-in-person
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL)1847/2009& CRL.M.A.2337/2014,4723/2015,4735/2015, 8726/2015,8288/2015,12821/2015,18874-18875/2015
ELIAMMA SEBASTAN Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manoj Taneja, Advocate (Amicus Curiae)
Petitioner-in-person
VERSUS
NCTDELHI&ORS. Respondent
Through: Mr.AmritSingh,Advocatefor Mr.Rahul Mehra,Standing Counsel(Criminal)with
SI Mukesh Kumar,PS- Dwarka North
Through: Mr.AmritSingh,Advocatefor Mr.Rahul Mehra,Standing Counsel(Criminal)with
SI Mukesh Kumar,PS- Dwarka North
W.P.(CRL)1135/2014 i& CRL.M.A12822/2015
ELIAMMA SEBASTIAN • Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manoj Taneja, Advocate (Amicus Curiae)
Petitioner-in-person
ELIAMMA SEBASTIAN • Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manoj Taneja, Advocate (Amicus Curiae)
Petitioner-in-person
VERSUS
MR.& MRS.SACHIDEVA & ASSO Respondent
Through: Mr.Amrit Singh,Advocatefor Mr.Rahul Mehra,Standing Counsel(Criminal)with
SI Mukesh Kumar,PS- Dwarka North Mr. Vikas Mahajan,CGSC with Mr. S.S.
Rai,Advocate for UOI
Through: Mr.Amrit Singh,Advocatefor Mr.Rahul Mehra,Standing Counsel(Criminal)with
SI Mukesh Kumar,PS- Dwarka North Mr. Vikas Mahajan,CGSC with Mr. S.S.
Rai,Advocate for UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
29.01.2016 Mr. Amrit Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf ofthe police, on instructions from SI Mukesh Kumar,Police Station- Dwarka North states that in view ofthe circumstance that the petitioner is an elderly lady, adequate police protection shall be afforded to her. Mr. Singh further states that the Beat
Constable of the concerned area shall also be sensitized in this behalf and telephone number ofthe SHO ofthe concerned Police Station as well as that of
2016:DHC:9295 SI Mukesh Kumarshall be provided to herso thatshe can approach to them in the event ofany threator apprehension.
Ordered accordingly.
In view ofthe aforesaid, as well as the orders passed by this Court on
26.11.2015 in W.P.(C) No.8655/2007, Mr. Manoj Taneja, learned amicus curiae, on instructions from Ms. Sebastian, the petitioner who is present in person m Courttoday,seeksleaveto withdrawthesewritpetitionsatthisstage.
Leave granted.
The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. Pendingapplicationsalsostand di^osedof.
SIDD]^RTH MRBDUL,J JANUARY 29,2016 dn 2016:DHC:9295
29.01.2016 Mr. Amrit Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf ofthe police, on instructions from SI Mukesh Kumar,Police Station- Dwarka North states that in view ofthe circumstance that the petitioner is an elderly lady, adequate police protection shall be afforded to her. Mr. Singh further states that the Beat
Constable of the concerned area shall also be sensitized in this behalf and telephone number ofthe SHO ofthe concerned Police Station as well as that of
2016:DHC:9295 SI Mukesh Kumarshall be provided to herso thatshe can approach to them in the event ofany threator apprehension.
Ordered accordingly.
In view ofthe aforesaid, as well as the orders passed by this Court on
26.11.2015 in W.P.(C) No.8655/2007, Mr. Manoj Taneja, learned amicus curiae, on instructions from Ms. Sebastian, the petitioner who is present in person m Courttoday,seeksleaveto withdrawthesewritpetitionsatthisstage.
Leave granted.
The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. Pendingapplicationsalsostand di^osedof.
SIDD]^RTH MRBDUL,J JANUARY 29,2016 dn 2016:DHC:9295
JUDGMENT