Full Text
BAIL APPLN._2286_2015_J : 2286 ; 2015 : 29/01/2016
; BAIL APPLICATION : Hon'able Mr/Mrs Justice PRATIBHA RANI J
Petitioner/Plaintiff Name : RAHUL KUMAR Respondent/Defendent Name : STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Petitioner/Piaintiff's Adv : SALEEM AHMED &OTHERS
Respondent/Defendant'AdV : ALPANA PANDEY &ANOTHER
Print Date Company Name : 22-06-2017 : DATASOFT COMPUTER SERVICES
2016:DHC:8375 CAUSE TITLE NAME OF THE PARTIES...
SI
,No.
H.C.D.0.A.-2 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COURT FEE
PAID.OF 20' PAGE 7^ V\- 7 Tte cass is fit for consifjnm p!Tv':a<i<lin3.s are pe^idiiv^ e oir usjni or m tne Sup
(»' . ncha. In tarrri-s of Rules a in C:h-h(C^ nf ihe. M;,sh r;r>j!H
Orders VoijA' Deniing Asslsiant F fe.....^.37..<2..... ent and her in K n
•eme Court
5 pro*!kled
Rtil&e &—
A.O.J.
[f. No Regist!/ar.^A5sjlt^iL'(eaisirar HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 2286/2015
RAHUL KUMAR ^ .
Petitioner
Through: Mr.Saleem Ahmed, Ms. Cham Dalai and Mr.Ajay Pratap Singh, Advs.
Through: Ms.Alpana Pandey, APP for the State SIBirender andHC Khiladi Ram, PS Sagarpur
ORDER o/o 20.10.2015 Crl. M.A.15678/2015 Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
1^ RAIL APPLN. 2286/2015 The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with FIR
No.750/2015 (P.S. Sagarpur) instituted for offences under Sections 452, 323, 506 and 34 of the IPG. Sections 379 and 458 of the IPC were added later.
The petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the complainant with fists, blows and legs along with other co-accused persons. It has been submitted that two of the co-accused persons with similar allegations have been enlarged on anticipatory bail while some ofthe accused persons have been granted regular bail.
Issue notice. Ms. Alpana Pandey, APP accepts notice. Status report be filed on or before the next date fixed.
Till the next date of hearing, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. The petitioner shall join investigation and would visit the
Police Station as and when required bythelO/SHO of the concerned Police
Station.
Renotify on 25.1.2016.
OCTOBER 20,2015 ns ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J Wc, CI
VUAY KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate with Ms. Cham Dalai & Mr. Ajay Pratap
Singh, Advocates
Through: Mr.Sudershan Joon, APP forthe State AND
RAHUL KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate with Ms. Cham Dalai & Mr. Ajay Pratap
Singh, Advocates
25.01.2016
ORDER
1. The Petitioner is directed to join the further investigation as and when required by the lO/SHOconcemed and alsoto providehis contactnumber to the 10 concemed to facilitate communication for the purpose of joining the investigation.
2. Re-notify on 29"^ January, 2016. Till then, no coercive steps shall be taken against the Petitioner. Order dasti.
JANUARY 25, 2016/'aky' >RATIBHA RANlTJr (/I !)!' loj/dj/f ^cy\y\-ccJ-^ ><o • $-69 & 70 + BAIL APPLN. 2189/2015 VIJAY KUMAR Through: Mr.Saleem Ahmed, Advocate with Ms.Charu Dala and Mr.Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates.
VERSUS
VERSUS
JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % ORDER 29.01.2016
1. By way ofthese two applications filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioners Vijay Kumar and Rahul Kumar are seeking anticipatory bail in BailAppl.Nos.2189 &2286 of2015 Page 1of[2] case FIRNo.750/2015 under Sections 452/323/506/34 IPG, PS Sagar Pur.
2. Heard.
3. Learned APP for the State submits that the petitioners have joined and have also co-operated in the investigation. Learned APP for the State further submits that chargehseet against these two petitioners shall be filed shortly.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on behalf of the State that the petitioners have joined investigation and chargesheet against them shall be filed shortly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioners namely Vijay Kumar and Rahul Kumar be released on bail on their each furnishing personal bond in the sum of ?20,000/- with one surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of lO/SHO concerned. However, the petitioners are directed to join the investigationas and when required by the lO/SHO concerned.
5. Both the applications stand disposed of. As prayed, copy of the order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties.
JANUARY 29, 2016 'st' f) Bail Appl.Nos.2189 & 2286 of2015 Page 2 of[2] )-4 To, 1[K \. Disposed IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI "=^^'^'1 CJ^ ^ /o The Registrai' General, High Court ofDelhi, New Delhi. /). 5 - /201 ^ BAIL APFLTCATION NO. -;L. PetitioE irnder Section 43.8/4S9M8^ of Code of Qrl. Procedure for grant of aritkipatox[7]./!:gg»l«r^ in caserelatingtoFIRNo.7S'0|(5" section Q 7275"^-^ IPG, registered atPolice Station 5 • State Sir, VERSUS, Ivci •Petitioner -Respondent.[1] aiiYclirected to forward herewith for immediate compliance/necessary action a; copy of ordc.r dated°^^i^ -1 lOl^passedintlieabovemerftionedpetitionbyHon'ble.fustice The Hon'ble Court while disposing of the case has directed that...?sbs4-....:^....^.<^.....y......^..ei:v.'?rl<w..'£s^...:rD..<?Aryrv.^.^.... ku-|.V..^. \....p. ]or^£....SI^..V^....(i^.!?Ai^...Jil.K^.Cirh?Tr7f?:'h^^....'ViO;....S. ^ XIQ.....H.o,..C©>n.c •-• • • •-•P"...Wo,.r!>I<?,\.v%....:^G>^.Qw^A&l....L«^r?rXAfdv.,S^:.^^^^ l£ OjsHo Other directions are contained in the enclosed copy of order. Please acknowledge receipt. ' "