Kartar Singh v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 29 Jan 2016 · 2016:DHC:686

Hima Kohli; Sunil Gaur

W.P.(C) 23053/2005

2016:DHC:686

constitutional petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for default and non-prosecution due to the petitioner and his counsel's absence despite being informed of the hearing.

Full Text

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 23053/2005
KARTAR SINGH ..... Petitioner
Through: None

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
HON'BLE MR. JUTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R 29.01.2016

JUDGMENT

1. Counsel for the respondents states that he has personally informed Mr. K.N. Tripathi, counsel for the petitioner, about the pendency of the present case. Despite the same, none is present for the petitioner.

2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for nonprosecution. HIMA KOHLI, J SUNIL GAUR, J JANUARY 29, 2016

Kartar Singh v. Union of India

AI Summary

Full Text

JUDGMENT

Contact Us for a Free Consultation