Yashwant Singh v. Ashutosh Verma

Delhi High Court · 09 Feb 2016 · 2016:DHC:8562-DB
Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta
FAO(OS)-550/2015 & FAO(OS)-552/2015
2016:DHC:8562-DB
civil appeal_allowed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of prolix appeals with liberty to file fresh focused appeals, cautioning against procedural errors and unfocused pleadings.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FAO(OS)-550/2015 YASHWANT SINGH Appellant Represented by: Mr.PrabhatKumar,Advocate
VERSUS
ASHUTOSH VERMA Respondent Represented by: Mr.Ratneshwar Kumar, Advocate
FAO(OS)552/2015
YASHWANT SINGH Appellant Represented by: Mr.PrabhatKumar,Advocate
VERSUS
ASHUTOSH VERMA Respondent Represented by: Mr.Ratneshwar Kumar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
09.02.2016
ORDER

1. The usual story of cut, copy and paste has resulted in utter confusion being occasioned in the two appeals.

2. To wit: challenge in FAO(OS)550/2015 is to an order which is only one page. The appeal spans 33 pages. We speak no more for the reason learned counsel for the appellant concedes that the prolix appeals have missed the point and lest the appeals suffer dismissal on a technical default, counsel seeks leave to withdraw both the appeals with rightreserved to file FAO(OS)550/2015 &FAO(OS)552/2015 page 1 of[2] 2016:DHC:8562-DB firesh appeals challenging the two orders which have been impugned in the two appeals.

3. Granting liberty we observe that he appellant would not resort to cutj copy and paste. The grounds ofchallenge and narrative offacts concerning the two impugned orders would be focused to bring out appellant's grievance concerning the two orders and not wander about in the woods as has happened in the two appeals.

4. No costs. CM No.25165/2015 Dismissed as withdrawn. -rr PRADEEP NANDRAJOG,J. MUKTA GUPTA,J. FEBRUARY 09,2016 'skb' FAO(OS)550/2015&FAO(OS)552/2015 page2of[2]