Full Text
Translation output
$-17 to 20 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CM(M) 852/2015 & C.M. No. 19385/2015
BHAGWAN SINGH
Petitioner
Through Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr.Adv. with Mr. P.Choudhary and Mr. Man Mohan
Gupta, Advocates.
CM(M) 852/2015 & C.M. No. 19385/2015
BHAGWAN SINGH
Petitioner
Through Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr.Adv. with Mr. P.Choudhary and Mr. Man Mohan
Gupta, Advocates.
VERSUS
BHAGWAN SINGH & ORS Respondents
Through Mr.Manish Vats, Advocate for R-1.
Through Mr.Manish Vats, Advocate for R-1.
CM(M) 853/2015 & C.M. No.19387/2015
VERSUS
BHAGWAN SINGH & GRS Respondent
CM(M) 854/2015 & C.M. No.19389/2015
VERSUS
2016:DHC:8555 .
CM(M) 856/2015 & C.M. No.19403/2015
VERSUS
Through Mr.Manish Vats. Advocate for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
09.02.2016 After some arguments learned counsels for the parties agree that the impugned order is not sustainable. It is accordingly set aside.
The plea oflis pendens which has been raised by the plaintiff in
-T: the Trial Court (his submission being that the sale deed qua defendant no.5 dated 03.8.2005 has been executed during the pendency of the suit which suit had been filed on 21.7.2005) is a legal plea available to the plaintiffand will be considered by the Trial/court on its merits.
Petitions disposed of INDERMEET KAUR, J FEBRUARY 09,2016/ndn
2016:DHC:8555
09.02.2016 After some arguments learned counsels for the parties agree that the impugned order is not sustainable. It is accordingly set aside.
The plea oflis pendens which has been raised by the plaintiff in
-T: the Trial Court (his submission being that the sale deed qua defendant no.5 dated 03.8.2005 has been executed during the pendency of the suit which suit had been filed on 21.7.2005) is a legal plea available to the plaintiffand will be considered by the Trial/court on its merits.
Petitions disposed of INDERMEET KAUR, J FEBRUARY 09,2016/ndn
2016:DHC:8555
JUDGMENT