P. Chakarborty v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 02 Feb 2016 · 2016:DHC:825
Hima Kohli; Sunil Gaur
W.P.(C) 9576/2005
2016:DHC:825
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner’s repeated failure to appear despite due notice.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 9576/2005
EXCT. P. CHAKARBORTY ..... Petitioner
Through: None
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R 02.02.2016
JUDGMENT

1. The present case has been reflected as pending in the regular cause list since 12.01.2016. However, none has appeared for the petitioner on 18.01.2016. Same was the position on 01.02.2016. Counsel for the respondents was requested to give a written intimation of the pendency of this case to the counsel for the petitioner.

2. Ms. Saahila Lamba, learned counsel for the respondents hands over a copy of the letter dated 29.01.2016 addressed to the counsel for the petitioner and sent by speed post on 30.01.2016. Despite the same, none is present on behalf of the petitioner. W.P.(C) 9576/2005 2016:DHC:825

3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for nonprosecution. HIMA KOHLI, J SUNIL GAUR, J FEBRUARY 02, 2016 rkb