Sanjay Sharma v. The Directorate of Enforcement

Delhi High Court · 12 Feb 2016 · 2016:DHC:8533
V. K. Shali
FAO192/2015
2016:DHC:8533
criminal appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

Appeals against provisional attachment orders were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek recall before the Directorate of Enforcement after discharge in related criminal proceedings.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FAO192/2015
SANJAY SHARMA Appellant
Through: Ms. Payal Jain, Advocate
VERSUS
THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Respondent
Through: Nemo.
FAO 193/2015
RAJESH SHARMA Appellant
Through: Ms. Payal Jain, Advocate
VERSUS
THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Respondent
Through: Nemo.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI
12.02.2016
ORDER

1. After brief submission, the learned counsel for the appellant has stated that since the appellants along with other accused persons have been discharged and it has been observed by the criminal courtthat the aggrieved party, that is, accused No:l in the criminal case will approach the Director, Directorate of Enforcement to have a provisional attachment order recalled, therefore, the learned counsel for the appellant is not pressing her present appeals with liberty to approach the Director, Directorate of Enforcement with the copy of the order passed by the criminal court to seek such appropriate remedy for the recall of the provisional attachment order as may be permissible under law.

2. Both the appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn with libe^^s prayed for. V.K. SHALI, J. FEBRUARY 12,2016/vk lt