Full Text
Translation output
$-43,44&45 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CM(M)147/2016&CM Nos.5540-5541/2016
ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO LTD Petitioner
Through Mr. Brijesh Bagga and Mr. Pankaj Gupta,Advs.
CM(M)147/2016&CM Nos.5540-5541/2016
ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO LTD Petitioner
Through Mr. Brijesh Bagga and Mr. Pankaj Gupta,Advs.
VERSUS
SHERPAL & ORS Respondent
Through Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for claimants
Through Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for claimants
CM(M)148/2016&CM Nos.5542-5543/2016
VERSUS
RAMWATI& ORS claimants
CM(M)149/2016&CM Nos.5544-5545/2016
VERSUS
URMILA & ORS claimants 2016:DHC:8612
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
17.02.2016 Though the petitions at hand by the insurance company are directed against order dated 30.09.2015 rejecting its objection to the maintainability ofthe claim petitions pending before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal -
02(SE)Saket, New Delhi on the ground of want ofterritorialjurisdiction, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the revised request for transfer ofthe claim cases to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in North
East District at Karkardooma Courts where some other connected claim petitions are already pending and some more have been transferred on similar petitions arising out ofthe same order ofthe Tribunal by order of this Court passed on 16.02.2016 may be allowed.
Issue notice to the claimants.
At this stage, Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate appears and accepts notice on behalfofthe claimants and submits that they have no objection to the prayer for transfer being granted on the same lines as was allowed in similar placed petitions granted on 16.02.2016. The order passed on
16.02.2016 in CM(M)Nos.28/2016,29/2016,31/2016 and 35/2016 reads as under;
"The learned counselfor claimantsfairly concedes thatsince the connected matters are pending before the motor accident claims tribunal of North East District ofDelhi at Karkardooma Courts complex, the shortprayer on behalfofpetitioner noted in the order dated 15.01.2016for the matters at hand to be transferredfrom the board ofthe tribunalatSaket Courts complex to the board ofmotor accident claims tribunal, North East District, Karkardooma Courts complex may be allowed.
The court is informed that there are two tribunalsfunctioning at North East District, Karkardooma Courts. In this view, the petition is allowed. The claim cases of the respondent pending before motor accident claims tribunal Saket Courts complex New Delhi, bearing nos.354/2014, 358/2014, 361/2014 & 362/2014 are withdrawnfrom thefile ofthe said tribunal and made over to the tribunal at North East District, Karkardooma Courts complexfor further inquiry in accordance with law.
The parties are directed to appear before the District &
Sessions Judge, North East District, Karkardooma Courts complex on OT'April, 2016, whereupon he shall make over the claim cases hereby transferred to the appropriate tribunalforfurther inquiry in accordance with law alongside the connected matters already pending there.
The transferor tribunal shall send the file complete in all respects wellin time to the transferee tribunal."
The present petitions are also allowed in respect of claim case
Nos.31/2015,360/2014 and 13/2015 with same directions as noted above.
R.K.GAOBA,J FEBRUARY 17,2016 VLD
17.02.2016 Though the petitions at hand by the insurance company are directed against order dated 30.09.2015 rejecting its objection to the maintainability ofthe claim petitions pending before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal -
02(SE)Saket, New Delhi on the ground of want ofterritorialjurisdiction, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the revised request for transfer ofthe claim cases to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in North
East District at Karkardooma Courts where some other connected claim petitions are already pending and some more have been transferred on similar petitions arising out ofthe same order ofthe Tribunal by order of this Court passed on 16.02.2016 may be allowed.
Issue notice to the claimants.
At this stage, Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate appears and accepts notice on behalfofthe claimants and submits that they have no objection to the prayer for transfer being granted on the same lines as was allowed in similar placed petitions granted on 16.02.2016. The order passed on
16.02.2016 in CM(M)Nos.28/2016,29/2016,31/2016 and 35/2016 reads as under;
"The learned counselfor claimantsfairly concedes thatsince the connected matters are pending before the motor accident claims tribunal of North East District ofDelhi at Karkardooma Courts complex, the shortprayer on behalfofpetitioner noted in the order dated 15.01.2016for the matters at hand to be transferredfrom the board ofthe tribunalatSaket Courts complex to the board ofmotor accident claims tribunal, North East District, Karkardooma Courts complex may be allowed.
The court is informed that there are two tribunalsfunctioning at North East District, Karkardooma Courts. In this view, the petition is allowed. The claim cases of the respondent pending before motor accident claims tribunal Saket Courts complex New Delhi, bearing nos.354/2014, 358/2014, 361/2014 & 362/2014 are withdrawnfrom thefile ofthe said tribunal and made over to the tribunal at North East District, Karkardooma Courts complexfor further inquiry in accordance with law.
The parties are directed to appear before the District &
Sessions Judge, North East District, Karkardooma Courts complex on OT'April, 2016, whereupon he shall make over the claim cases hereby transferred to the appropriate tribunalforfurther inquiry in accordance with law alongside the connected matters already pending there.
The transferor tribunal shall send the file complete in all respects wellin time to the transferee tribunal."
The present petitions are also allowed in respect of claim case
Nos.31/2015,360/2014 and 13/2015 with same directions as noted above.
R.K.GAOBA,J FEBRUARY 17,2016 VLD
JUDGMENT