M/S SHIV NARESH SPORTS PVT. LTD. v. GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI

Delhi High Court · 26 Feb 2016 · 2016:DHC:1675
Manmohan Singh
OMP (ENF)(COMM) Nos.9/2016 & 10/2016
2016:DHC:1675
civil appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the Government of NCT of Delhi to pay the decreetal amount under an arbitral award within four weeks, failing which attachment proceedings would follow, thereby enforcing the award under Order XXI Rule 10 CPC.

Full Text
Translation output
OMP (ENF)(COMM) Nos.9/2016 & 10/2016 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
Reserved on: 24th February, 2016
Judgment Pronounced on: 26th February, 2016 O.M.P. (ENF) (COMM.) No.9/2016
M/S SHIV NARESH SPORTS PVT. LTD. ..... Decree Holder
Through Ms.Anusuya Salwan, Adv. with Ms.Renuka Arora & Mr.Vikas Kunal
Kohli, Advs.
versus
GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Judgment Debtor
Through Mr.Sanjay Dewan, Adv. O.M.P. (ENF) (COMM.) No.10/2016
M/S SHIV NARESH SPORTS PVT. LTD. ..... Decree Holder
Through Ms.Anusuya Salwan, Adv. with Ms.Renuka Arora & Mr.Vikas Kunal
Kohli, Advs.
versus
GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Judgment Debtor
Through Mr.Sanjay Dewan, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.

1. The abovementioned execution petitions have been filed by the decree-holder under Order XXI Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC seeking 2016:DHC:1675 OMP (ENF)(COMM) Nos.9/2016 & 10/2016 execution of the Award dated 18th September, 2014 passed by the sole Arbitrator, Sh.S.R.Pandey, under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2. In view of two judgments delivered by this Court in petitions being OMP Nos.181/2015 & 182/2015 while dismissing the objections of PWD/ judgment-debtor and after hearing both the parties, the judgment-debtor is directed to pay the decreetal amount towards the Award passed in favour of decree-holder within a period of four weeks from today, otherwise, orders for attachment for the said amount would be passed after the expiry of the said period. The decree-holder is allowed to revive the execution petitions if such payments are not made.

3. Both the petitions are accordingly disposed of.

JUDGE FEBRUARY 26, 2016