Full Text
Translation output
$^^6 & 7 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FAO(OS) 571/2015
BDR PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED Appellant
Represented by: Ms.Rajeshwari H., Advocate
FAO(OS) 571/2015
BDR PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED Appellant
Represented by: Ms.Rajeshwari H., Advocate
VERSUS
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY & ORS Respondents
Represented by: Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with
Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advocates
Represented by: Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with
Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advocates
FAO(OS) 573/2015
M/S BDR LIFESCIENCES PVT LTD Appellant Represented by: Ms.Rajeshwari H., Advocate
M/S BDR LIFESCIENCES PVT LTD Appellant Represented by: Ms.Rajeshwari H., Advocate
VERSUS
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY & ANR Respondents
Represented by: Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with
Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advocates
Represented by: Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with
Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
23.02.2016 CM No.23117/2015 inFAO COS) No.571/2015
CM No.23122/2015 in FAQ rOS^No.573/2015 For the reasons stated in the two applications delay of 63 days in
Page 1 of2 2016:DHC:8564-DB ly filing the appeals is condoned.
The applications are disposed of.
FAQ rOS) No.571/2015 & 573/2015
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
23.02.2016 CM No.23117/2015 inFAO COS) No.571/2015
CM No.23122/2015 in FAQ rOS^No.573/2015 For the reasons stated in the two applications delay of 63 days in
Page 1 of2 2016:DHC:8564-DB ly filing the appeals is condoned.
The applications are disposed of.
FAQ rOS) No.571/2015 & 573/2015
ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the appellants states that she has been instructed bythe appellants to withdraw theabove captioned appeals.
2. Shestates thatthe appellants are intouch withthe respondents to seek a permission/license from them concerning the patent inquestion.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents states that the respondents have no objection to the appeals being withdrawn without imposition of any cost upon the appellants,
4. The appeals areaccordingly dismissed aswithdrawn.
5. No costs. CMNo.23116/2015 inFAO No.571/2015 CM No.23121/2015 in FAQ TOS^No.573/2015 Dismissed as not pressed.
FEBRUARY 23, 2016 mamta PRADEEP NA >JOG, MUKTA GUPTA, J. Page 2 of[2]