Charanjit Singh Aulakh v. Director General CISF HQ

Delhi High Court · 24 Feb 2016 · 2016:DHC:1566-DB
Hima Kohli; Sunil Gaur
W.P.(C) 10435/2006
2016:DHC:1566-DB
constitutional petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear despite due notice.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 10435/2006
CHARANJIT SINGH AULAKH ..... Petitioner
Through: None.
VERSUS
DIRECTOR GENERAL CISF HQ. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Manu Padalia, proxy counsel for Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R 24.02.2016
JUDGMENT

1. The present case has been reflected in the regular cause list since 03.02.2016. However, none has appeared for the petitioner.

2. On 12.2.2016, learned counsel for the respondents was requested to give a written intimation of the pendency of the present case to the counsel for the petitioner. When the matter was taken up on 19.2.2016, the Court was informed that counsel for the petitioner had been duly intimated about the pendency of the present case. Despite the same, none was present for the petitioner on 23.2.2016. Same is the position even today.

3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. HIMA KOHLI, J SUNIL GAUR, J FEBRUARY 24, 2016