B.N. Mishra v. UOI and Ors.

Delhi High Court · 11 Mar 2016 · 2016:DHC:2087
Hima Kohli; Sunil Gaur
W.P.(C) 18224/2006
2016:DHC:2087
constitutional petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for default and non-prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear despite due notice.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 18224/2006
B.N. MISHRA ` ..... Petitioner
Through: None
VERSUS
UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R 11.03.2016
JUDGMENT

1. The present matter has been reflected in the regular cause list since 03.02.2016 and was taken up on several dates, i.e., on 19.02.2016, 24.02.2016, 03.03.2016 and 09.03.2016. On 19.02.2016, counsel for the respondents was requested to give written intimation of the pendency of this case to Mr. Y.S. Chauhan, counsel for the petitioner. On 24.02.2016, counsel for the respondents had informed that he had duly intimated counsel for the petitioner about the pendency of this case. However, none had appeared for the petitioner on 24.02.2016 and same was the position on 03.03.2016 and 09.03.2016. W.P.(C) 18224/2006 2016:DHC:2087

2. Even today, none is present on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. HIMA KOHLI, J SUNIL GAUR, J MARCH 11, 2016 rkb