Full Text
Translation output
$-12 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CM(M) 639/2015
RAJIV VAID
Petitioner
Through Mr. K.S.Pathaina, Advocate
CM(M) 639/2015
RAJIV VAID
Petitioner
Through Mr. K.S.Pathaina, Advocate
VERSUS
USHA MANN & ORS
Through Respondent Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for
Respondent No. 1
Through Respondent Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for
Respondent No. 1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
09.03.2016 Petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 30.04.2015 vide which the application filed by defendant No.2 under Order 9
Rule 13 of the CPC seeking setting aside of the ex-parte judgement and decree dated 27.04.2012 only qua defendant no. 2 is allowed.
This is clear from the reading of the order itself No further orders are called for. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission ofthis
Court to withdraw this petition. Permission/is granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn. Ir" MARCH 09, 2016 gb
INDEl^EET KAUR, J 2016:DHC:8593
09.03.2016 Petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 30.04.2015 vide which the application filed by defendant No.2 under Order 9
Rule 13 of the CPC seeking setting aside of the ex-parte judgement and decree dated 27.04.2012 only qua defendant no. 2 is allowed.
This is clear from the reading of the order itself No further orders are called for. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission ofthis
Court to withdraw this petition. Permission/is granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn. Ir" MARCH 09, 2016 gb
INDEl^EET KAUR, J 2016:DHC:8593
JUDGMENT