Full Text
Translation output
$37&38 HIGH COURT OF DELHI ± W.P.(C)2159/2016
UNION OF iNDIA AND ANR . ... ..Petitioners
Through: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna,Adv.
UNION OF iNDIA AND ANR . ... ..Petitioners
Through: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna,Adv.
VERSUS
RAJ KUMAR AND ORS Respondents
Through: None. -
Through: None. -
W.P.(C) 2162/2016
UNTON OF INDIA - ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. V.S. R.Krishna;.Adv.
UNTON OF INDIA - ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. V.S. R.Krishna;.Adv.
VERSUS
RAM SAROOP & ORS. Respondents
Through: None.
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
15.03.2016 CM APPL. 9228/20 16 (For exemption)in W.P.(C) 2159/2016
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
15.03.2016 CM APPL. 9228/20 16 (For exemption)in W.P.(C) 2159/2016
CM APPL. 9235/2016 (For exemption) in W.P.(C) 2162/2016
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CM APPL. 9229/20 16 (delay in re-filing) in W.P.(C) 2159/2016
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CM APPL. 9229/20 16 (delay in re-filing) in W.P.(C) 2159/2016
CM APPL. 9236/2016 (delay in re-filing) in W.P.(C) 2162/2016
Applications are allowed and delay in re-filing is condoned.
Applications stand disposed of. -
Applications are allowed and delay in re-filing is condoned.
Applications stand disposed of. -
W.P.(C) 2159/2016 & CM APPL. 9227/2016 (stay)
2016:DHC:9209-DB.4 -
2016:DHC:9209-DB.4 -
W.P.(C) 2162/2016 & CM APPL. 9234/2016 (stay)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to. file .a review application as it is stated that the impugned order was passed without notice to the petitioner.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.
We also grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition impugning the order under challenge, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order filed in their review application.
SANJI 'ANNA, J NA IWAZIRI,J MARCH 15, 2016/acm -
2016:DHC:9209-DB
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to. file .a review application as it is stated that the impugned order was passed without notice to the petitioner.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.
We also grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition impugning the order under challenge, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order filed in their review application.
SANJI 'ANNA, J NA IWAZIRI,J MARCH 15, 2016/acm -
2016:DHC:9209-DB
JUDGMENT