Harpreet Singh & Ors v. Ashish Rajpae & Ors

Delhi High Court · 02 Mar 2016 · 2016:DHC:8633
J. R. Midha
CONT.CAS(C)131/2016
2016:DHC:8633
other appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn with liberty to revive them if the service tax particulars furnished by the respondents are found to be incorrect.

Full Text
Translation output
$-31 &33 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C)131/2016
JUDGMENT

31 HARPREET SINGH & ORS Petitioners Through: Mr.Ashish Garg,Adv.

VERSUS

ASHISH RAJPAE& ORS Respondents Through: Mr.Abhishek Malhotra and Mr.Rijul Taneja,Advs. + CONT.CAS(C)115/2016 33 HARPREET SINGH & ORS Petitioners Through: Mr.Ashish Garg,Adv.

VERSUS

ASHISH RAJPAE& ORS Respondents Through: Mr.Abhishek Malhotra and Mr.Rijul Taneja,Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.R.MIDHA ORDER % 02.03.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have furnished the particulars ofthe service tax to the petitioner and the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw these petitions with liberty to revive these petitions in the event of the particulars furnished by the respondents are found to be incorrect. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as^ayed for. « rR.MIDHA,J. MARCH 02,2016 ak