Rachna v. The Indian Army & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 03 Mar 2016 · 2016:DHC:1841
Hima Kohli; Sunil Gaur
W.P.(C) 1871/2016
2016:DHC:1841
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw a writ petition while reserving the right to enforce a settlement agreement before the competent court.

Full Text
Translation output
WP(C) 1871/2016
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 1871/2016 and CM APPL.8001-8002/2016
RACHNA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Dharmender Sharma, Advocate with
Ms. Monika Singh, Advocate and petitioner in person.
VERSUS
THE INDIAN ARMY & ORS ..... Respondents
Through : Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Sumit Rajput, Advocate for R-1.
Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for R-2/GNCTD.
Ms. Sonia Mathur, Advocate with Mr. Sushil Kumar Dubey, Advocate for R-3/CBI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R 03.03.2016
JUDGMENT

1. The present petition has been listed subject to office objections with regard to its maintainability.

2. Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition while reserving her right to approach the competent court for seeking enforcement of the settlement dated 21.12.2015 recorded between the petitioner and the respondent No.4 before the Mediation Centre, Saket Court Complex, New Delhi in CC No.100/3/15 in accordance with law. 2016:DHC:1841 WP(C) 1871/2016

3. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn alongwith the pending applications. HIMA KOHLI, J SUNIL GAUR, J MARCH 03, 2016 rkb