Kumar Enterprises and Anr v. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. and Anr

Delhi High Court · 28 Mar 2016
Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta
W.P.(C) 5425/2014
administrative appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed two writ petitions as withdrawn on the petitioners' instructions and dismissed related interlocutory applications as infructuous.

Full Text
Translation output
$-7 & 8 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 5425/2014
KUMAR ENTERPRISES AND ANR Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Arvind Sharma, Advocate.
VERSUS
ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA)
LTD. AND ANR Respondents Represented by: Ms.Kirti Kumar, Advocate for
R-1.
W.P.(C) 5427/2014
KUAAN INTERNATIONAL LTD. & ORS Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Arvind Sliarma, Advocate.
VERSUS
ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA)
LTD. & ANR Respondents Represented by: Ms.Kriti Kumar, Advocate for
R-L
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
28.03.2016 L Mr.Arvind Sharma, counsel for the writ petitioners of the above- captioned petitions states that he has been instructed by the petitioners to withdraw the above-captioned writ petitions. ^
ORDER

2. The two writ petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. ' W.P.(C) 5425/2014 & 5427/2014 Page 1 of[2] 2016:DHC:8973-DB CM Nos.10784/2014 in W.P.fQ 5425/2014 rStav^ CM Nos.10788/2014 in W.P.fQ 5427/2014 rStav^ Applications are dismissed as infmctuous.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. MUKTA GUPTA, J. MARCH 28, 2016 'vn'