Sumit Nanda v. The State

Delhi High Court · 30 Mar 2016
S. P. Garg
BAIL APPLN.279/2016 & BAIL APPLN.280/2016
criminal appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused petitioners following an amicable settlement involving financial restitution and cooperation for quashing the FIR.

Full Text
Translation output
$-24&25 AND HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN.279/2016
SUMIT NANDA Petitioner
Through: Mr.Vineet Malhotra,Advocate with Mr.Shubhendu Kaushik,Advocate.
VERSUS
THE STATE(GOVT OF NOT OFDELHI) Respondent
Through ; Mr.Amit Gupta,APP.
Mr.Manoj Ohri,Sr.Advocate with Ms.Arunima Dwivedi,Advocate for the complainant.
SI B.K.Bharti.
BAIL APPLN.280/2016
KUNAL RAM CHANDANI
Through Petitioner Mr.Vineet Malhotra,Advocate with
Mr.Shubhendu Kaushik,Advocate.
VERSUS
THE STATE(GOVT OF NOT OFDELHI)
/T OF NOT OFDELHI) Respondent
Through: Mr.Amit Gupta,APP.
Mr.Manoj Ohri,Sr.Advocate with Ms.Arunima Dwivedi,Advocate for the complainant.
SI B.K.Bharti.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.P.GARG
30.03.2016
ORDER

1. During the course ofarguments, it was informed that the matter has been settled between the parties.

2. The petitioners have no objection to the release of^20 lacs to the complainant deposited by them before the Registrar General ofthis Court incomplianceofthe order dated 05.02.2016. Accordingly,?20lacs along BAILAPPLN.279/2016&BAILAPPLN.280/2016 pageIof[2] 2016:DHC:8235 with accrued interest(if any) shall be released to the complainant- Anil Jain by the Registrar General ofthis Court.

3. It is further agreed that the vehicle seized in this case shall be taken by the petitioners and the complainant shall hand over all the original documents pertaining to the said vehicle to the petitioners.

4. It is further settled that an MOU will be prepared / executed incorporating the terms and conditions of the settlement and the complainant shall co-operate and assist the petitioners in getting the FIR No.11/2016 registered under Sections 406/409/420/120B IPG at PS Inder Puri quashed.

5. It is further settled that the complainant shall not be responsible for any civil or criminal liability regarding the vehicle in question which remained out of his possession from 08.08.2015 till its recovery on 01.02.2016.

6. Since the matter has been settled between the parties,the petitioners are granted anticipatory bail and in the event ofarrest,they be released on furnishing personal bonds in the sum of? 50,000/- with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction ofthe SHO/Investigating officer. They shall, however,join the investigation as and when required. The parties shall be bound by the terms and conditions ofthe settlement.

7. The bail applications stand disposed of.

MARCH 30,2016/ tr.P.GARG,J BAIL APPLN.279/2016& BAIL APPLN.280/2016 page2of[2]