Vikraman v. UOI and Ors.

Delhi High Court · 07 Apr 2016 · 2016:DHC:2892-DB
Hima Kohli; Sunil Gaur
W.P.(C) 2328/2007
2016:DHC:2892-DB
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition in default and for nonprosecution due to the petitioner's repeated failure to appear and prosecute the case.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 2328/2007
VIKRAMAN ..... Petitioner
Through: None
VERSUS
UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Rashid Goel, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R 07.04.2016
JUDGMENT

1. The present matter has remained on the regular board since 29.02.2016. The same was taken up on 03.03.2016, 15.03.2016 and 16.03.2016. However, none had appeared for the petitioner. On 17.03.2016, proxy counsel appearing for Mr. Rajeev Sharma, counsel for the petitioner had sought an adjournment. At his request, the matter was not taken up on the said date. On 28.03.2016, again, none had appeared for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents states that he had personally informed Mr. Rajeev Sharma, counsel for the petitioner about the pendency of the case in the interregnum. W.P.(C) 2328/2007 2016:DHC:2892-DB

3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for nonprosecution. HIMA KOHLI, J SUNIL GAUR, J APRIL 07, 2016 rkb