M/S Viresh Buildcon Pvt. Ltd v. Neutral Access Operator Pvt Ltd

Delhi High Court · 10 May 2016 · 2016:DHC:9227
Pratibha Rani
CRL.REV.P. 113/2016
2016:DHC:9227
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of criminal revision petitions without liberty to file fresh petitions, holding that subsequent developments cannot justify withdrawal with such liberty against the same impugned orders.

Full Text
Translation output
$-52 to 55 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.REV.P. 113/2016
M/S VIRESH BUILDCON PVT. LTD & ANR Petitioners
Through: Mr.Vidit Gupta, Advocate
VERSUS
NEUTRAL ACCESS OPERATOR PVT LTD Respondent
Through: None AND
CRL.REV.P. 114/2016
VERSUS
NEUTRAL ACCESS OPERATORPVT LTD Respondent AND
CRL.REV.P. 115/2016
VERSUS
HARI SHANKAR SINGH Respondent AND
CRL.REV.R 116/2016
M/S VIRESH BUILDCON PVT. LTD &ANR ^.. Petitioners
VERSUS
HARI SHANKAR SINGH Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI CRL.REV.P. 113, 114,115& 116/2016 ~ Page1of2
2016:DHC:9227

10.05.2016 Crl. M.A. 7599/2016 in Crl. Rev. P. 113/2016
Crl. M.A. 7598/2016 in Crl. Rev. P. 114/2016 Crl. M.A. 7597/2016 in Crl. Rev. P. 115/2016
Crl. M.A. 7606/2016 in Crl. Rev. P. 116/2016
ORDER

1. By way of these applications petitioners are seeking permission to withdraw these revision petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions for challenging the impugned orders dated 22*"^ January, 2016 and 24"" February, 2016 by incorporating subsequent events,

2. Heard.

3. Considering that these revision petitions have been filed impugning the order dated 22"^ January, 2016 any subsequent development cannot be made a ground to withdraw the revision petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions for challenging the impugned order. Hence petitioners cannot be permitted to withdraw the revision petitions with the liberty as prayed.

4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners may be permitted to withdraw these revision petitions without granting any liberty asprayed for intheapplication.

5. These applications are allowed and the next date of hearing i.e. August, 2016 fixed in these matters stand cancelled.

6. The applications stand disposed of Crl. Rev. P. 113/2016 & Crl. M.A. 2576/2016 Crl. Rev. P: 114/2016 8l Crl. M.A. 2578/2016 Qrl. Rev. P. 115/2016 & Crl. M.A. 2580/2016 Crl. Rev. P. 116/2016 & Crl. M.A. 2582/2016 These revision petitions along with the pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn. MAY 10, 2{Sl6rpg' CRL.REV.P. 113,114,115 & 116/2016 PRATIB