United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Ram Khilari & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 27 May 2016 · 2016:DHC:4442
R. K. Gauba
MAC APP. No.794/2014
2016:DHC:4442
civil appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the motor accident claim tribunal's award including non-pecuniary damages as per binding Supreme Court precedent.

Full Text
Translation output
MAC APP. No.794/2014 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 27.05.2016
MAC.APP. 794/2014
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD..... Appellant
Through Mr. Amit Gaur, Adv.
VERSUS
RAM KHILARI & ORS..... Respondent
Through Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Adv. for R- 1 to 4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
JUDGMENT
R.K.GAUBA, J (ORAL):

1. The case (suit No.86/14) before the motor accident claims tribunal (tribunal), presented by the first to fourth respondents (claimants) on 03.03.3014 was on account of death of Ram Beti, a housewife died in motor vehicular accident that took place on 03.02.2014 involving negligent driving of bus bearing registration No.DL 1PC 8061 of Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company (insurer).

2. The tribunal awarded compensation of `14,02,176/- with interest at 9% per annum in favour of the claimants, following the law laid down by 2016:DHC:4442 MAC APP. No.794/2014 this Court in Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Ltd. v. Manmeet Singh 2012 ACJ 721. The only grievance raised by the appellant in this appeal is that the inclusion of non-pecuniary heads of damages as per dictum in Rajesh v. Rajbir Singh 2013 (6) SCALE 563 was improper.

3. This Court finds no merit in the appeal. The law laid down by the Supreme Court in Rajesh v. Rajbir Singh is binding.

4. The appeal is dismissed.

5. By order dated 11.09.2014, the insurance company had been directed to deposit the entire awarded amount with accumulated interest out of which 75% was allowed to be released, the balance kept in fixed deposit receipt. The Registrar General shall now issue necessary directions for balance held to be released.

6. The statutory deposit, if made, shall be refunded.

JUDGE MAY 27, 2016 VLD