M/S SUPERON SCHWEISSTECHNIKINDIA LTD v. M/S APS ADVERTINTERNATIONALPVTLTD

Delhi High Court · 08 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:8613
S. Muralidhar
CS(COMM)583/2016
2016:DHC:8613
civil appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court decreed the commercial suit limited to prayer (a) following the defendant's statement, imposed costs payable to the Legal Services Committee, and held the defendant bound by its court undertaking.

Full Text
Translation output
$-9 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CS(OS)3305/2015
M/S SUPERON SCHWEISSTECHNIKINDIA LTD Plaintiff
Through: Mr.D.K.Yadav,Advocate
VERSUS
M/S APS ADVERTINTERNATIONALPVTLTD Defendant
Through: Mr.SarfarazKhan,Advocate
CORAM:
DR.NEERA BHARIHOKE(DHJS),JOINTREGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
16.05.2016 "The Registry is directed to re-number thepresentsuitas CS
(Commercial) and while allotting the new number, the Registry shall also indicate on thefile, the old registration number ofthe case." lA No.2744/2016(under Order VHRule 10 CPC.bv plaintiffI
Reply has been filed.Learned counsel forthe applicantsubmits thathe doesnotwish to file any rejoinder.Accordingly,the pleadings are complete.
CSIOSI 3305/2015
Written statement, documents as well as vakalatnama has been filed on behalfofthe defendant.Learned counsel for the plaintiffhas
2016:DHC:8613 fl handed over an advance copy ofthe replication to learned counsel for the defendant and undertakesto file the same during the course ofthe day.Let original documents be filed by the defendant by 15.07.2016 to be followed by admission / denial affidavit within the next two weeks.
Let admission / denial of documents of the plaintiff be conducted in the court on 09.08.2016.
MAY 16,2016 hk DR.NEERA BHARIHOKE(DHJS)
JOINTREGISTRAR(JUDICIAL)
MkJtr .
^jsi/^'UiKfir ^jof
, ro-MAo€)
} '/ 0^ $-7 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CS(COMM)583/2016&LA.Nos.23160/2015,2744,8299/2016
M/S.SUPERON SCHWEISSTECHNIKINDIA LIMITED Plaintiff
Through: Mr.Sanjeev Singh,Advocate.
VERSUS
M/S.APS ADVERTINTERNATIONALPVT.LTD Defendant
Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan with Mr. Ataur Rahman, Advocates with Mr. Tarun Jindal,Director in person.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR
08.09.2016 1.The Director ofthe Defendantis presentin Court and is willing to give a statement and the same has been recorded and is placed below the order and will be part ofthe order.
ORDER

2. In view of the statement made by the Defendant the plaintiff does not press for any other reliefexcept prayer(a). Accordingly,the suit is decreed in terms ofprayer(a).Decree sheetbe drawn up accordingly.

3. In view ofthe above statement,the Plaintiffdoes not press for any other relief.

4. The cost ofRs.10,000/- will be paid by the Defendants. Atthe request of n/^ learned counsel for the Plaintiffthis cost be paid to Delhi High CourtLegal Services Committee, New Delhi within a period offour weeks and proof thereofbe placed on record.

5. The Defendant is bound by the undertaking given in the Court. Ifthere is any violation of the undertaking, the Defendant shall be liable to be proceeded for disobedience ofthe Court's order. y 6.Thesuitandpendingapplicationsare disposedof.

S.MURALIDHAR,J SEPTEMBER 08,2016 hs