Nitesh Chaudhary v. Union of India and Anr

Delhi High Court · 18 May 2016 · 2016:DHC:4045
Hima Kohli; Sunil Gaur
W.P.(C) 10748/2015
2016:DHC:4045
constitutional petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner’s absence and failure to file a rejoinder despite being granted opportunities.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 10748/2015
NITESH CHAUDHARY ..... Petitioner
Through: None
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Vriyal, Advocate with Mr. Jivesh Tiwari, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R 18.05.2016
JUDGMENT

1. None is present on behalf of the petitioner. Same was the position on the last date of hearing. Despite the fact that the petitioner’s counsel was absent, in the interest of justice, last opportunity was granted to the petitioner to file rejoinder. Rejoinder has not been filed till date.

2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for nonprosecution. HIMA KOHLI, J SUNIL GAUR, J MAY 18, 2016 rkb