Mohammad Nihal v. State of Delhi & Ors

Delhi High Court · 01 Jun 2016 · 2016:DHC:9113-DB
G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
W.P.(CRL)1804/2016
2016:DHC:9113-DB
constitutional petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition alleging illegal detention of a major who voluntarily left her parental home to reside with the petitioner.

Full Text
Translation output
$-31 \ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL)1804/2016
MOHAMMAD NIHAL
Through
VERSUS
STATE OF DELHI& ORS
Through Petitioner Mr.Pinaki Addy with Ms.Sharda Garg, Advocates
Respondents Mr.Rahul Mehra,Standing Counsel with
Mr.Amit Singh,Mr.Shekhar Budakoti, Advocates for the State along with
Inspector Satya Prakash,P.S.Subhash Place.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
01.06.2016 This is a petition filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution ofIndia by the petitioner who claims to be having a live in relation with Preeti Kashyap. As per the petition, Preeti Kashyap, respondent no.4 who is a major, is being illegally detained by her father. Preeti Kashyap is present in Court. She submits that she has already left her parental home and has voluntarily decided to reside with the petitioner. The petitioner, who is present in Court, submits that he would be responsible for the well-being of Preeti Kashyap. The petitioner, accordingly,submits thatthatthe petition has become infructuous.
The petition stands disposed ofas having become infructuous.
G.S.SISTANI,J JUNE 01,2016/pst SANGIIKADHI SEHGAL,J
2016:DHC:9113-DB
JUDGMENT