Trusine Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Delhi Value Added Tax & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 02 Jun 2016 · 2016:DHC:8934-DB
S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakru
2016:DHC:8934-DB
tax petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions concerning VAT refund interest payments based on respondents' assurances to release dues by a specified date, allowing revival if assurances are not met.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
33.
W.P.(0 520/2016 TRUSINE ELECTRONICS. PVT. LTD Petitioner
Through: Mr A.K. Babbar, Ms Ruchi Babbar, Ms Amita Babbar, Mr Surindera Kumar, Advocates,
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX, & ANR. Respondent
Through: Mr Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr R.A. Iyer , Advocate with Mr Babu Lai, VATO.
WITH
34.
W.P.(0 521/2016 TRUSINE ELECTRONICS PVT LTD. Petitioner
VERSUS
. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. Respondents
VATO.
WITH
35.
W.P.(C) 564/2016
VERSUS
TAX & ANR. Respondents 2016:DHC:8934-DB Mr R.A. Iyer,Advocate with Mr Babu Lai, VATO.
WITH
36.
W.P.ra 840/2016 TRUSINE ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. Petitioner
VERSUS
TAX & ANR. Respondents VATO.
AND
37.
W.P.(CI 841/2016
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR.
Respondent VATO.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
02.06.2016
ORDER

1. Mr Gautam Narayan, has handed over a chart regarding the refund amount due and released in all the five cases. As far as interest on refunds is concerned, it has been released for the period of August, 2012. As far as the remaining four periods i.e. 1'^, 2"'', 3'"'' and 4'^ quarters of 2013-14 is concerned, Mr Gautam Narayan, on the instructions of Mr Babu Lai, Value Added Tax Officer ('VATO') present in Court, states that the interest payment has already been released for first quarter of 2013-14. The interest for the second quarter will bereleased tomorrow. The remaining two interest amounts will be released one in each of the following weeks and this exercise will be completed positively onorbefore 20'^ June, 2016.

2. Inview ofthe above assertions, the writ petitions are disposed of.

3. The Petitioner is at liberty to revive the petitions in case the above assurances are not adhered to. Order dasti under signature of the Court Master

S. MURALIDHAR, J

VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUNE 02,2016 pkv