SRAVANTHI INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. GREENS POWER EQUIPMENT (CHINA) CO. LTD

Delhi High Court · 14 Jul 2016 · 2016:DHC:8323
Manmohan Singh
ARB.P. 462/2015
2016:DHC:8323
arbitration petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the arbitration appointment petition as withdrawn, holding that the Supreme Court is the competent forum under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Full Text
Translation output
2016:DHC:8323 r,? r p HTGH COURT OF DELHI subjectl 122012 -••ARB. PETITION U/S 11 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION
ACT 1996 Subject2 :0NOTENTERED (S
DIARY 396922/2015 CASE ARB.P. Filingl3/08/15
MO : TYPE : Date :12:46:10 SRAVANTHIINFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED
Vs.
GREENS POWEREQUIPMENT (CHINA) CO. LTD.
The case has been passed for date : 17-AUG-15
The petition/appeal being in order,may be registered.
SCRU ASSISTANT: SH.SUNIL DUTT c? Signature Dealing Assistant
AOJ/ARCX )
V f 1^ A /V http://l0.25.196.159/html/prashant/defect.php?dno=396922&dyr=2015 14-08-2015
$-33 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ARB.P. 462/2015
SRAVANTm INFRATECH PRIVATE LiMITED Petitioner
Through: Mr. Piyush Joshi with Ms. Uttara Babbar, Advs.
VERSUS
GREENS POWER EQUIPMENT (CHINA) CO. LTD.
Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
17.08.2015 Issue notice to the respondent by all modes including registered, speed post and/or approved courier on filing of process fee within one week, returnable on 10.09.2,015. Dasti as well.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J AUGUST 17,2015/ak 4..
$-9 IN THE HIGH COIJR! OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SRAVANTHI INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner
Through: Mr. Piyush Joshi, Ms. Uttara Babbar & Mr, Vinod Kapoor, Advs.
VERSUS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMl WAZIRI
10.09.2015 Issue fresh notice within one week lo the respondent by all modes including registered, speed post and/or approved courier on filing of the process fee. Returnable on 16.10.2015. Daisti as well.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 $-4 Petitioner
Through: Mr. Uttara Babbar with Mr. Vinod Kapoor, Advs.
VERSUS
CORAM:
16.10.2015 Process fee was returned under objection. Fresh process fee be filed and notice be issued through all modes, returnable on
04.12.2015.
WAZIRI, J OCTOBER 16,2015/acm -krVT r $-3 V HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SRAVANXm INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner
Through: Mr. Piyush Joshi & Ms. Uttara Babbar, Advocates
VERSUS
GREENS POWER EQUIPMENT (CHINA) CO. LTD Respondent
Through
CORAM:
04.12.2015 The Service Report is awaited.
Issue notice to the respondent by all modes, including registered, speed post and/or approved courier on filing of process fee within one week, returnable on 16^'^December, 2016. Dastiaswell.
NA, I WAZIRI, J DECEMBER 04,2015 tp $--5
ARB.P. 462/2015
Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pitush Joshi with Ms. Uttava Babbar with Mr. Vinod Kapoor, Advs.
VERSUS
GREENS POWEREQUIPMENT (CHINA) CO.LTD.
CORAM:
16.12.2015 Dasti notice has been collected. The respondent has not been served. Let fresh notice be issued to the respondent through allmodes including dasti, returnable on27.04.2016.
DECEMBER 16,2015/acm n <1. "^1 $^16 SRAVANTHIINFRATECH PRIVATE LTD Petitioner
Through Ms Uttara Babbar, Adv
VERSUS
GREENSPOWER EQUIPMENT (CHINA)CO. LTD Respondent
Through
CORAM:
SH. S.S. MALHOTRA (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
01.02.2016 lA No. 1404/2016 (under O. 22 R.4 CPC. bv petitionerl
Ld. counsel for petitioner submits that she be given liberty to withdraw the instant application as provisions under O. 22 R.4 (1) CPC does not apply to respondent company and she also seeks liberty to file the same afresh, under appropriate provisions.
This application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.
This lA stands disposed off accordingly.
S.S. MALHOTRA (DHJS)
JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
FEBRUARY 01, 2016
•I'
$-7 SRAVANTHIINFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner
Through None
VERSUS
Through Mr.Atul Kumar, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
27.04.2016 Reply be filed by the respondent within four weeks.
List on 14^ July, 2016.
APRIL 27,2016/ka J.
\ SRAVANTHIINFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner
Through Mr.Piyush Joshi, Adv.
VERSUS
Through Mr.Atul Kumar, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
14.07.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition, with a liberty to file a firesh petition before the Supreme Court which is the competent Court to decide the petition under Section 11 ofthe
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. As prayed, the petition isdismissed as withdrawn. Libertyas soughtis granted.
SINGH, JULY 14,2016/ka
JUDGMENT