Full Text
Translation output
30#«&31#$ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAILAPPLN. 1002/2016
RAGHUBIR SINGH , Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Ramesh Arora, Advocate.
BAILAPPLN. 1002/2016
RAGHUBIR SINGH , Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Ramesh Arora, Advocate.
VERSUS
STATE (NOT OFDELHI)
Represented by;
Represented by;
BAIL APPLN. 1007/2016
URMILA
Represented by:
URMILA
Represented by:
VERSUS
Respondent Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with SI Asha Singh, PS
Neb Sarai.
Petitioner Mr. Ramesh Arora, Advocate.
STATE (NOT OFDELHI) Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the
State with SI Asha Singh, PS Neb Sarai.
Neb Sarai.
Petitioner Mr. Ramesh Arora, Advocate.
STATE (NOT OFDELHI) Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the
State with SI Asha Singh, PS Neb Sarai.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
14.07.2016 Learned proxy counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have been arrested and thus the present petitions have become infructuous.
Learned APP for the State supports the statement on instructions from the Investigating Officer. Learned APP further points out towards the status report wherein also it has been reflected that the petitioners have been arrested and are injudicial custody.
Petitions are dismissed as infmctuous.
MUKTA GUPT^T JULY 14,2016/'vn' 2016:DHC:8262
14.07.2016 Learned proxy counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have been arrested and thus the present petitions have become infructuous.
Learned APP for the State supports the statement on instructions from the Investigating Officer. Learned APP further points out towards the status report wherein also it has been reflected that the petitioners have been arrested and are injudicial custody.
Petitions are dismissed as infmctuous.
MUKTA GUPT^T JULY 14,2016/'vn' 2016:DHC:8262
JUDGMENT