Ransingh Chauhan v. Puneetkumar Goel & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 18 Jul 2016 · 2016:DHC:8635
Manmohan J
CONT.CAS(C)802/2016
2016:DHC:8635
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple contempt petitions as infructuous following a subsequent Division Bench order, granting petitioners liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings if future breaches occur.

Full Text
Translation output
$-43 to 47 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C)802/2016&C.M.No.24910/2016
RANSINGHCHAUHAN Petitioner
Through Mr.Mobin Akhtar,Advocate.
VERSUS
PUNEETKUMAR GOEL&ORS
Through Mr.AnujAggarwal,ASC with Mr.Shubhanshu Gupta,Advocatefor
R-3.
CONT.CAS(C)803/2016&C.M.No.24909/2016
^ A f.TT TAT TTDTTv Petitioner CM PRAKASH DUBEY
Through Mr.Mobin Akhtar,Advocate,
VERSUS
PUNEETKUMARGOEL&ORS , Through Mr.AnujAggarwal,ASC with
Mr.Shubhanshu Gupta,Advocatefor R-3.
CONT.CAS(C)804/2016&C.M.No.24911/2016
T^AATAirAxiT Petitioner RAMA KANT
Through Mr.Mobin Akhtar,Advocate,
VERSUS
PUNEETKUMARGOEL&ORS fir
Through Mr.VinodKumarBhati,Advocatefor GNCTD.
CONT.CAS(C)807/2016&C.M.No.24908/2016
AMRESHKUMAR Petitioner 2016:DHC:8635
VERSUS
PUNEETKUMARGOEL&ORS Respondents
Through Mr.Vinod KumarBhati,Advocate tor GNCTD.
CONT.CAS(C)810/2016&C.M.No.24822/2016
BACHCHU SINGH Petitioner
VERSUS
PUNEETKUMARGOEL&ORS •••••Respondents
Through Mr.Vinod KumarBhati,Advocate tor GNCTD.
CORAM;
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN
ORDER o/o 18.07.2016 In view ofthe subsequent order ofthe Division Bench dated 18 May,2016passedinLPA No.136/2016,thisCourtisoftheopinionthat
3 the present contempt petitions have become infructuous. Accordingly, the same are disposed of.
In the event,there is any breach ofthe Division Bench order,the petitioners are given liberty to file an appropriate proceeding in accordance with law.
The next date of hearing fixed in the present cases stand cancelled.
MANMOHAN,J JULY 18,2016 2016:DHC:8635
JUDGMENT