Sambhu v. Naresh Kumar & Ors

Delhi High Court · 03 Aug 2016 · 2016:DHC:8699
Manmohan
CONT.CAS(C)908/2016
2016:DHC:8699
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of contempt petitions as infructuous following a binding Division Bench interpretation of the Street Vendors Act, granting liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings if non-compliance continues.

Full Text
Translation output
$-36& 37 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C)908/2016&C.M.Nos.27673-27674/2016
SAMBHU Petitioner
Through Mr.Pranab Prakash,Advocate.
VERSUS
NARESH KUMAR& ORS
Through Respondents Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara ASC with
Mr.Mananjay Mishra,Advocate NDMC.
CONT.CAS(C)909/2016&C.M.Nos.27675-27676/2016
RAJU Petitioner
Through Mr.Pranab Prakash,Advocate.
VERSUS
NARESH KUMAR& ORS Respondents
Through Mr.Sri HarshaPeechara ASC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra,Advocate
NDMC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN
03.08.2016 Present contempt petitions have been filed alleging wilful disobedience ofthe order dated 24'^^ November,2014 passed by this
Court.
After passing ofthe said order,a Division Bench ofthis Court while disposing ofLPA No.136/2016 videjudgment and order dated tVi
ORDER

18 May, 2016 has interpreted the Street Vendors (Protection of 2016:DHC:8699 Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 as well as rulesframed thereunder and has given binding directions. Consequently,present contempt petitions and applications have become inffuctuous and they stand disposed of. In the event, the petitioners are of the view that the Division Bench order is not being complied with, petitioners are given liberty to file appropriate proceedingsin accordance with law. Wi manmOTian,j AUGUST 03,2016 KA