Full Text
Translation output
•>1
$-30-32.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 1236/2013
MUKESH KUMAR SINGH
Through- Mr. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate -with Mr. Riyaz A. Bhat, Mr. Amartaya, Advocates
$-30-32.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 1236/2013
MUKESH KUMAR SINGH
Through- Mr. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate -with Mr. Riyaz A. Bhat, Mr. Amartaya, Advocates
VERSUS
Respondent
Through; Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC with Ms. Seema Patnaha, Advocate
Through; Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC with Ms. Seema Patnaha, Advocate
W.P.(CRL) 1240/2013
„T Petitioner
KG1YAG Mr. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Advocates
„T Petitioner
KG1YAG Mr. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Advocates
VERSUS
STATE Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC with Ms. SeemaPatnaha, Advocate
W.P.(CRL) 1241/2013 ctxtz-u Petitioner
^ Through- Mr. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Advocates
^ Through- Mr. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Advocates
VERSUS
STATE
2016:DHC:9069
Through; Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC with Ms. SeemaPatnaha, Advocate
CORAIVI;
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
26.07.2016 The submission oflearned Senior Counsel for the petitioner is that in case the petitioner is permitted to advance his submissions before the
SpecialCourt inrelationtothe offencesundertheP.O. Act aswell asunder the IPC, including those in which charges have been framed by the impugiiedorder,thepetitionerwouldnot pressthe presentpetitions.
In view ofthe aforesaid, the present petitions are disposed ofwhile permittingthe petitioner to urge all pleas and submissions available to him before^the Special Court in relation to all offences, including those falling under fhe P.C. Act and IPC offences, and in which charges have been framed. The impugnedorder shallnot come in theway ofthe Special Court whiledealingwiththesaid submissions which shall beexamined afresh.
The petitions stand disposed of. Dasti.
JULY 26, 2016 si VIPIN SANGHI, J 2016:DHC:9069
2016:DHC:9069
Through; Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC with Ms. SeemaPatnaha, Advocate
CORAIVI;
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
26.07.2016 The submission oflearned Senior Counsel for the petitioner is that in case the petitioner is permitted to advance his submissions before the
SpecialCourt inrelationtothe offencesundertheP.O. Act aswell asunder the IPC, including those in which charges have been framed by the impugiiedorder,thepetitionerwouldnot pressthe presentpetitions.
In view ofthe aforesaid, the present petitions are disposed ofwhile permittingthe petitioner to urge all pleas and submissions available to him before^the Special Court in relation to all offences, including those falling under fhe P.C. Act and IPC offences, and in which charges have been framed. The impugnedorder shallnot come in theway ofthe Special Court whiledealingwiththesaid submissions which shall beexamined afresh.
The petitions stand disposed of. Dasti.
JULY 26, 2016 si VIPIN SANGHI, J 2016:DHC:9069
JUDGMENT