Full Text
Translation output
$-4 & 5 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RFA 148/2016 and CM No.9425/2016
VED PRAKASH SHARMA Appellant
Through Mr.V.Siva Subramanian and Mr.Manish Parmar,Advs.along with appellant
RFA 148/2016 and CM No.9425/2016
VED PRAKASH SHARMA Appellant
Through Mr.V.Siva Subramanian and Mr.Manish Parmar,Advs.along with appellant
VERSUS
LT COL RP SHARMA(RETD) Respondent
Through Mr.M.P.S.Kasana,Advocate along with respondent
Through Mr.M.P.S.Kasana,Advocate along with respondent
RFA 149/2016 and CM No.9429/2016
VED PRAKASH SHARMA Appellant
Through Mr.V.Siva Subramanian and Mr.Manish Parmar,Advs.along with appellant
VED PRAKASH SHARMA Appellant
Through Mr.V.Siva Subramanian and Mr.Manish Parmar,Advs.along with appellant
VERSUS
LT COL RP SHARMA(RETD) Respondent
Through Mr.M.P.S.Kasana,Advocate along with respondent
Through Mr.M.P.S.Kasana,Advocate along with respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
17.08.2016 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties in both the appeals, on instructions from the latter, who are present in-person in Court today, invite my attention to a Compromise Agreement dated 8"^ August, 2016 entered into by and between them,to urge in unison that the present appeals may be disposed ofas having been compromised,in terms thereof.
The said Compromise Agreement dated S"" August, 2016 is annexed as
'Annexure A'to the presentappeals.
2016:DHC:9323 The said Compromise Agreement dated 8^*^ August,2016 is in writing and has been signed by the parties as well as their counsel.
I have perused the said Compromise Agreement dated 8^ August, 2016 and the same is lawful. It is, therefore, accepted by this Court,leaving the parties to perform their reciprocal obligations in terms thereof, without demur.
In view of the foregoing, the submission made on behalf of the learned counsel appearing on behalfofthe parties is hereby accepted.
The registry is directed to process the refund of court fees in accordance with the provisions ofSection 16A ofthe Court Fees Act, 1870, as applicable to Delhi.
The registry is further directed to return the Trial Court record to the concerned court.
The appeals are accordingly disposed ofas having been compromised.
With the above directions,the appeals are disposed ofaccordingly.
Pending applications also stand disposed of.
SIDDmRTH MRIDUL,J AUGUST 17,2016 sd 2016:DHC:9323
17.08.2016 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties in both the appeals, on instructions from the latter, who are present in-person in Court today, invite my attention to a Compromise Agreement dated 8"^ August, 2016 entered into by and between them,to urge in unison that the present appeals may be disposed ofas having been compromised,in terms thereof.
The said Compromise Agreement dated S"" August, 2016 is annexed as
'Annexure A'to the presentappeals.
2016:DHC:9323 The said Compromise Agreement dated 8^*^ August,2016 is in writing and has been signed by the parties as well as their counsel.
I have perused the said Compromise Agreement dated 8^ August, 2016 and the same is lawful. It is, therefore, accepted by this Court,leaving the parties to perform their reciprocal obligations in terms thereof, without demur.
In view of the foregoing, the submission made on behalf of the learned counsel appearing on behalfofthe parties is hereby accepted.
The registry is directed to process the refund of court fees in accordance with the provisions ofSection 16A ofthe Court Fees Act, 1870, as applicable to Delhi.
The registry is further directed to return the Trial Court record to the concerned court.
The appeals are accordingly disposed ofas having been compromised.
With the above directions,the appeals are disposed ofaccordingly.
Pending applications also stand disposed of.
SIDDmRTH MRIDUL,J AUGUST 17,2016 sd 2016:DHC:9323
JUDGMENT