Full Text
Translation output
I
$-37 & 47 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 7825/2016
RAISINA BENGALI SCHOOL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rana. S. Biswas and Mr. Sunil Sharma, Advocates
$-37 & 47 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 7825/2016
RAISINA BENGALI SCHOOL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rana. S. Biswas and Mr. Sunil Sharma, Advocates
VERSUS
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC AND
Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC AND
W.P.(C) 7854/2016
SUBRATA SEN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mridul Chakravarty, Advocate
SUBRATA SEN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mridul Chakravarty, Advocate
VERSUS
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC.
Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
0/0 05.09.2016
0/0 05.09.2016
CM 32347/2016 & CM 32476/2016 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 7825/2016 & W.P.(C) 7854/2016
By these petitions, Mr. Subrata Sen seeks re-employment as the
Principal of Raisina Public School. It is not in dispute that Raisina Public
School is a Government aided School. Apropos the appointment or re- appointment of the Principal, approval of the Government of NCT of Delhi
2016:DHC:8670 through the Office of the Director of Education would be necessary. Mr. Subrata Sen superannuated from the post of Principal on 31st March 2016.
The Management Committee of the school vide resolution dated 10th July 2015 resolved to re-employ Mr. Subrata Sen for a term of two years. The representations and letters from the school and Mr. Subrata Sen to respondent No.1 have not evoked any response till date.
In the circumstances, at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, these writ petitions shall be treated as a representation by respondent No.1, who shall dispose it offwithin a period of four weeks from today with a reasoned order and with due intimation to the petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on service of advance notice submits that the Government has already expressed its mind by way of order dated 26th May 2015, however, it will look into the same for the second time. This Court expresses no view in the matter on the merits ofthe case.
The petitions stand disposed off in the aforesaid terms.
SEPTEMBER 05,2016 Aj NAJ AZIRI, J HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(el 7825/2016 RAISINA BENGALI SCHOOL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rana S. Biswas and Mr. Sunil Shatma, Advocates.
By these petitions, Mr. Subrata Sen seeks re-employment as the
Principal of Raisina Public School. It is not in dispute that Raisina Public
School is a Government aided School. Apropos the appointment or re- appointment of the Principal, approval of the Government of NCT of Delhi
2016:DHC:8670 through the Office of the Director of Education would be necessary. Mr. Subrata Sen superannuated from the post of Principal on 31st March 2016.
The Management Committee of the school vide resolution dated 10th July 2015 resolved to re-employ Mr. Subrata Sen for a term of two years. The representations and letters from the school and Mr. Subrata Sen to respondent No.1 have not evoked any response till date.
In the circumstances, at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, these writ petitions shall be treated as a representation by respondent No.1, who shall dispose it offwithin a period of four weeks from today with a reasoned order and with due intimation to the petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on service of advance notice submits that the Government has already expressed its mind by way of order dated 26th May 2015, however, it will look into the same for the second time. This Court expresses no view in the matter on the merits ofthe case.
The petitions stand disposed off in the aforesaid terms.
SEPTEMBER 05,2016 Aj NAJ AZIRI, J HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(el 7825/2016 RAISINA BENGALI SCHOOL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rana S. Biswas and Mr. Sunil Shatma, Advocates.
VERSUS
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents and Mr. Rizwan, Advocate for
RespondentlGNCTD.
RespondentlGNCTD.
AND
W.P.(el 785412016 SUBRATASEN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mridul Chakravarty, Advocate.
W.P.(el 785412016 SUBRATASEN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mridul Chakravarty, Advocate.
VERSUS
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents and Mr. Rizwan, Advocate for
RespondentlGNCTD.
•
RespondentlGNCTD.
•
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
03.11.2016 CM Nos.40568 & 40775 of2016 (for exemption)
Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
The applications stand disposed off.
CM No.4077612016 (for delay) in W.P.(el 785412016
This application seeks condonation of delay, which is stated to be of two days in filing the Review Petition No.484/2016. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned and the Review Petition is taken on record.
The application stands disposed off Review Petition No. 47912016 in W.P.(e) 782512016
Review Petition No. 48412016 in W.P.(e) 785412016
These review petitions seek correction of the typographical errors of the order dated 05.09.2016. inasmuch as it records the petitioner's name as
'Raisina Public School ', instead of 'Raisina Bengali Schoor. Furthermore, it seeks correction of the date of the Resolution of the Management
Committee of the school, which is recorded as 10'11 July, 20]5 instead of 20'11 February, 2016. The aforesaid etTOrs are evident and are con'ected accordingly.
The applicant further seeks correction to the extent that the said order records that 'The representations and letters from the school and Mr. Subrata Sen to respondent No.1 have not evoked any response till date'. Instead it should have recorded that the same have not evoked any response in his favour. There is no objection to this. The order dated 05.09.2016 stamls corrected accordingly.
The review petitions stand disposed off.
• NAJI WAz,Rl. J.
NOVEMBER 03, 2016 sb
03.11.2016 CM Nos.40568 & 40775 of2016 (for exemption)
Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
The applications stand disposed off.
CM No.4077612016 (for delay) in W.P.(el 785412016
This application seeks condonation of delay, which is stated to be of two days in filing the Review Petition No.484/2016. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned and the Review Petition is taken on record.
The application stands disposed off Review Petition No. 47912016 in W.P.(e) 782512016
Review Petition No. 48412016 in W.P.(e) 785412016
These review petitions seek correction of the typographical errors of the order dated 05.09.2016. inasmuch as it records the petitioner's name as
'Raisina Public School ', instead of 'Raisina Bengali Schoor. Furthermore, it seeks correction of the date of the Resolution of the Management
Committee of the school, which is recorded as 10'11 July, 20]5 instead of 20'11 February, 2016. The aforesaid etTOrs are evident and are con'ected accordingly.
The applicant further seeks correction to the extent that the said order records that 'The representations and letters from the school and Mr. Subrata Sen to respondent No.1 have not evoked any response till date'. Instead it should have recorded that the same have not evoked any response in his favour. There is no objection to this. The order dated 05.09.2016 stamls corrected accordingly.
The review petitions stand disposed off.
• NAJI WAz,Rl. J.
NOVEMBER 03, 2016 sb
JUDGMENT