Rohit v. The State of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 14 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:8347
Mukta Gupta
BAILAPPLN. 1072/2016
2016:DHC:8347
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the bail petition as infructuous since the petitioner had already been granted bail by the Sessions Court.

Full Text
Translation output
$-11 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAILAPPLN. 1072/2016
ROHIT
Petitioner Represented by; None
VERSUS
THE STATE OF DELHI
Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, aPP with
SI Ravi Kumar PS S.B. Dairy.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
14.09.2016 Since 13" September, 2016 was declared aholiday vide notification
No.2092/G-4/Genl./DHC the matter is being taken up today.
Present none forthepetitioner.
Learned APP for the State on instructions from the investigating officer submits that the petitioner has been granted bail by the learned
Additional Sessions Judge. This appears to be the reason for non- appearance on behalfof the petitioner.
In view of the statement of learned APP for the State, petition is dismissed as infructuous.
SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 'ga' MUKTA GUPTA, J.
2016:DHC:8347
JUDGMENT