Full Text
Translation output
M
$-2&3 ' HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FAO(OS)266/2016& CM No.33798/2016
RAJAN SAHNI&ORS Appellants
Through: Mr Salman Khurshid,Senior Advocate with MsRoshni Anand,Ms Mitali
Chauhan,Ms Gagri Srivastav,Mr Abhishek Saket,Mr RahulDubey,Mr
Vijay Aggarwal,Mr Saket Sikri and Mr Ankur Sood,Advocates
$-2&3 ' HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FAO(OS)266/2016& CM No.33798/2016
RAJAN SAHNI&ORS Appellants
Through: Mr Salman Khurshid,Senior Advocate with MsRoshni Anand,Ms Mitali
Chauhan,Ms Gagri Srivastav,Mr Abhishek Saket,Mr RahulDubey,Mr
Vijay Aggarwal,Mr Saket Sikri and Mr Ankur Sood,Advocates
VERSUS
LIFE TBCHNOLOGIES CORPORATION &ANR Respondents
Through: Mr C.M.Lall,MsNancy Roy,Mr Jayant Kumar,MsAdya Khanna and Mr Rupin
Bahl,Advocates
Through: Mr C.M.Lall,MsNancy Roy,Mr Jayant Kumar,MsAdya Khanna and Mr Rupin
Bahl,Advocates
FAO(OS)267/2016&CM No.33800/2016
LIFE TECHNOLOGIESINDIA PVT LTD &ANR Appellants
Through: Mr Salrnan Khurshid,Senior Advocate with Ms Roshni Anand,Ms Mitali
Chauhan,Ms Gagri Srivastav,Mr Abhishek Saket,MrRahul Dubey,Mr
Vijay Aggarwal,Mr Saket Sikri and Mr Ankur Sood,Advocates
LIFE TECHNOLOGIESINDIA PVT LTD &ANR Appellants
Through: Mr Salrnan Khurshid,Senior Advocate with Ms Roshni Anand,Ms Mitali
Chauhan,Ms Gagri Srivastav,Mr Abhishek Saket,MrRahul Dubey,Mr
Vijay Aggarwal,Mr Saket Sikri and Mr Ankur Sood,Advocates
VERSUS
LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION &ANR Respondents
Through: Mr C.M.Lall,MsNancy Roy,Mr Jayant Kumar,Ms Adya Khanna and Mr Rupin
Bahl,Advocates
Through: Mr C.M.Lall,MsNancy Roy,Mr Jayant Kumar,Ms Adya Khanna and Mr Rupin
Bahl,Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BADARDURREZ AHMED
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
29.09.2016 2016:DHC:8439-DB We are informed by the learned counsel for the respondents thatthe petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.0271 dated 27.07.2016 registered at Police Station Rani Bagh has already been filed. In that view ofthe matter, since the said quashing petition pertains to the FIR, the same would obviously be decided independently in accordance with law. Those are criminal proceedings and we are not making any commentsthereon.
The other requirement for production ofDirectors before the learned single
Judge on the next date ofhearing is also complained ofin the appeal(FAO(OS)
266/2016). We see no reason to interfere with the same. However,the appellant would be at liberty to seek exemption for some of the Directors by moving an appropriate application before the learned single Judge who would take a call on the matter.
The appeals are disposed ofaccordingly.
BADAR DURREZAHMED,J ASHUTOSH KUMAR,J SEPTEMBER 29,2016 ns
2016:DHC:8439-DB
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
29.09.2016 2016:DHC:8439-DB We are informed by the learned counsel for the respondents thatthe petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.0271 dated 27.07.2016 registered at Police Station Rani Bagh has already been filed. In that view ofthe matter, since the said quashing petition pertains to the FIR, the same would obviously be decided independently in accordance with law. Those are criminal proceedings and we are not making any commentsthereon.
The other requirement for production ofDirectors before the learned single
Judge on the next date ofhearing is also complained ofin the appeal(FAO(OS)
266/2016). We see no reason to interfere with the same. However,the appellant would be at liberty to seek exemption for some of the Directors by moving an appropriate application before the learned single Judge who would take a call on the matter.
The appeals are disposed ofaccordingly.
BADAR DURREZAHMED,J ASHUTOSH KUMAR,J SEPTEMBER 29,2016 ns
2016:DHC:8439-DB
JUDGMENT