State v. Sarif

Delhi High Court · 29 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:9138
Mukta Gupta
W.P.(CRL) 153/2016 & 154/2016
2016:DHC:9138
criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court granted leave to withdraw criminal writ petitions and dismissed them as withdrawn, directing payment of previously imposed costs.

Full Text
Translation output
45# and 46# $~ • ' .
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 153/2016 and Crl.M.A. No. 867/2016 (Stay) l^OHDYUSUF Petitioner
STATE & ANR Represented by: Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate.
VERSUS
Represented by:
Respondents, Ms. Nandita Rao, Additional- Standing Counsel for the State with SI Inderveer Singh, PS
Karawal Nagar.
W.P.(CRL) 154/2016 and Cfl .M.A. No. 870/2016 (Stay)
SARIF
Representedby:
VERSUS
STATE & ANR Represented by;
' Petitioner Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate.
Respondents Ms. Nandita Rao, Additional Standing Counsel for
Ms.Kanina Vohra, Additional Standing Counsel for the State with SI Inderveer Singh, PS
Karawal Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
29.09.2016 After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petitions and the applications and states that the cost as imposed vide order dated 28'^ September, 2016 will be paid within two days.
W.P.(CRL) 153/2016 &154/2016 Page 1of2
2016:DHC:9138 Leave granted.
Petitions and applications are.dismissed aswithdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 29,2016 'vn'
W.P.(CRL) 153/2016 &154/2016 Page 2 of2
2016:DHC:9138
JUDGMENT