Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C.3680/2010
BALJEET&ORS , Petitioners
Through :Mr.Karamveer Singh,Adv.
CRL.M.C.3680/2010
BALJEET&ORS , Petitioners
Through :Mr.Karamveer Singh,Adv.
VERSUS
STATE(NCTOFDELHI)&ORS Respondents
Through :Mr.Sudershan Joon,APP AND
Through :Mr.Sudershan Joon,APP AND
CRL.M.C.3687/2016
BIRJU&ORS Petitioners
Through ;Mr.Karamveer Singh,Adv.
BIRJU&ORS Petitioners
Through ;Mr.Karamveer Singh,Adv.
VERSUS
STATE(NCTOFDELHI)&ORS Respondents
Through ;Mr.Sudershan Joon,APP
Through ;Mr.Sudershan Joon,APP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.K.PATHAK
ORDER o/o 30.09.2016 Crl.M.A.Nos.15425/2016 15439/2016(exemption)
Allowed,subjectto alljustexceptions. Applications are disposed of.
CRL.M.C.Nos.3680/2016& CRL.M.C.3687/2016 By these petitions, petitioners have prayed for quashing of the
2016:DHC:9070 following cross FIRs:- (a) FIR No.278/2012 under Sections 451/323/354/509/34IPC registered at P.S. Pul Prahlad Pur on the complaint of respondent no. 2 Ms. Sunita Gupta in Crl.M.C.No.3687/2016.
(b) FIR No.279/2012 under Sections 323/341/354/509/34IPC registered atP.S.Pul Prahlad Pur on the complaint ofrespondent no.2Ms. Suman in
Crl. M.C.No.3680/2016.
Petitioners and private respondents in both the petitions belong to one family and are living in the same locality. A quarrel ensued between them, wherein both the parties sustained simple injuries. Allegations of molestation were also levelled by both the parties against each other. After the investigation, charge-sheets were filed and trial in both the cases are in progress. During the trial, parties were referred to Mediation Centre, wherein they have settled their disputes amicably on the terms and conditions recorded in the proceedings of the Mediation Centre on
25.1.2016. Both the parties wantto maintain harmonious relation in future and have condoned their acts.
Keeping in mind that disputes arose between the members of same family and they have settled their disputes before the Mediation Centre,no fruitful purpose would be served to keep them entangled in criminal cases.
Accordingly, in the interest of justice both the FIRs, that is, FIR NO. 278/2012 under Sections 451/323/354/509/34 IPG and FIR No. 279/2012 under Sections 323/341/354/509/34 IPG both registered at P.S.Pul Prahlad
Pur andthe consequentproceedings emanatingtherefrom,are quashed.
Both the writpetitions are disposed ofinthe aboveterms. Dasti.
A.lCnPATHAK,J.
SEPTEMBER 30,2016 rb
ORDER o/o 30.09.2016 Crl.M.A.Nos.15425/2016 15439/2016(exemption)
Allowed,subjectto alljustexceptions. Applications are disposed of.
CRL.M.C.Nos.3680/2016& CRL.M.C.3687/2016 By these petitions, petitioners have prayed for quashing of the
2016:DHC:9070 following cross FIRs:- (a) FIR No.278/2012 under Sections 451/323/354/509/34IPC registered at P.S. Pul Prahlad Pur on the complaint of respondent no. 2 Ms. Sunita Gupta in Crl.M.C.No.3687/2016.
(b) FIR No.279/2012 under Sections 323/341/354/509/34IPC registered atP.S.Pul Prahlad Pur on the complaint ofrespondent no.2Ms. Suman in
Crl. M.C.No.3680/2016.
Petitioners and private respondents in both the petitions belong to one family and are living in the same locality. A quarrel ensued between them, wherein both the parties sustained simple injuries. Allegations of molestation were also levelled by both the parties against each other. After the investigation, charge-sheets were filed and trial in both the cases are in progress. During the trial, parties were referred to Mediation Centre, wherein they have settled their disputes amicably on the terms and conditions recorded in the proceedings of the Mediation Centre on
25.1.2016. Both the parties wantto maintain harmonious relation in future and have condoned their acts.
Keeping in mind that disputes arose between the members of same family and they have settled their disputes before the Mediation Centre,no fruitful purpose would be served to keep them entangled in criminal cases.
Accordingly, in the interest of justice both the FIRs, that is, FIR NO. 278/2012 under Sections 451/323/354/509/34 IPG and FIR No. 279/2012 under Sections 323/341/354/509/34 IPG both registered at P.S.Pul Prahlad
Pur andthe consequentproceedings emanatingtherefrom,are quashed.
Both the writpetitions are disposed ofinthe aboveterms. Dasti.
A.lCnPATHAK,J.
SEPTEMBER 30,2016 rb
JUDGMENT