M/S KANTI BIJEE UTPADAN NIGAM LIMITED v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR

Delhi High Court · 24 Oct 2016 · 2016:DHC:7153
Hima Kohli
W.P.(C) 9647/2016
2016:DHC:7153
other appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue remedies before the appropriate forum, and dismissed the petition accordingly.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 9647/2016 & CM No.38574/2016
M/S KANTI BIJEE UTPADAN NIGAM LIMITED..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. S.K. Taneja, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Puneet Taneja, Advocate
VERSUS
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR ..... Respondents
Through : Mr. Gaurav Srivastava, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI O R D E R 24.10.2016
JUDGMENT

1. Mr. Taneja, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner states that the briefing counsel has obtained instructions from the petitioner to the effect that they may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, while reserving the right of the petitioner to seek its remedies against the respondents as per law, before the appropriate forum vested with territorial jurisdiction to entertain the same.

2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, along with the pending application. HIMA KOHLI, J OCTOBER 24, 2016