Full Text
Translation output
$-14/31 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 994/2016
SUNIL KUMAR JAIN Petitioner
Through :Mr. Rakesh Malhotra and Mr. AshrafYusufKhan, Advs.
BAIL APPLN. 994/2016
SUNIL KUMAR JAIN Petitioner
Through :Mr. Rakesh Malhotra and Mr. AshrafYusufKhan, Advs.
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through :Dr. M.P. Singh APP with SI Rakesh Kumar, P.S. Bara Hindu Rao
Through :Dr. M.P. Singh APP with SI Rakesh Kumar, P.S. Bara Hindu Rao
AND
BAIL APPLN. 993/2016
SURENDER KUMAR JAIN Petitioner
Through :Mr. Rakesh Malhotra and Mr. AshrafYusuf Khan, Advs.
SURENDER KUMAR JAIN Petitioner
Through :Mr. Rakesh Malhotra and Mr. AshrafYusuf Khan, Advs.
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through Dr. M.P. Singh APP with SI Rakesh Kumar, P.S. Bara Hindu Rao
Through Dr. M.P. Singh APP with SI Rakesh Kumar, P.S. Bara Hindu Rao
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
10.11.2016 Sunil Kumar Jain is the Attorney of Surender Kumar Jain. Both the
2016:DHC:8741 petitioners have filed these anticipatory bail applications in FIR NO. 15072014 under Sections 420/468/471 IPG registered at P.S. Bara Hindu
Rao on the complaint ofone Ms. Sonia Vaid. Disputes arose between the complainant and Surender Kumar Jain with regard to the shops bearing nos.
3761/3761-A/3762, Main Road, Pahari Dheeraj, Delhi. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that four civil suits were also filed by Surender
Kumar Jain, wherein complainant was one of the parties. Vide MOU dated
17^ June, 2016 matter has been compromised. It is further submitted that possession of one shop bearing no. 3761, MainRoad, Pahari Dheeraj, Delhi has been handed over by Surender Kumar Jain to the complainantMs. Sonia
Vaid. In the status report also, it is mentioned that petitioners and complainant Ms. Sonia Vaid have executed the MOU and the possession of
J the shops in question has been handed over to Ms. Sonia Vaid. It is further, submitted that civil suits have already been withdrawn by the petitioner
_ Surender Kumar Jain.
Keeping in mind the totality of circumstances, it is ordered that in case of arrest, petitioners be released on anticipatory^ bail, subject to their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ^20,000/-(Rupees Twenty
,, Thousand Only) each with one surety each of the like, amount to the satisfaction ofthe Investigation Officer/Arresting Officer/SHb concerned.
Both the bail applications are disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
A.K^VATHAK, J.
NOVEMBER 10,2016 ^ rb . ^ /
10.11.2016 Sunil Kumar Jain is the Attorney of Surender Kumar Jain. Both the
2016:DHC:8741 petitioners have filed these anticipatory bail applications in FIR NO. 15072014 under Sections 420/468/471 IPG registered at P.S. Bara Hindu
Rao on the complaint ofone Ms. Sonia Vaid. Disputes arose between the complainant and Surender Kumar Jain with regard to the shops bearing nos.
3761/3761-A/3762, Main Road, Pahari Dheeraj, Delhi. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that four civil suits were also filed by Surender
Kumar Jain, wherein complainant was one of the parties. Vide MOU dated
17^ June, 2016 matter has been compromised. It is further submitted that possession of one shop bearing no. 3761, MainRoad, Pahari Dheeraj, Delhi has been handed over by Surender Kumar Jain to the complainantMs. Sonia
Vaid. In the status report also, it is mentioned that petitioners and complainant Ms. Sonia Vaid have executed the MOU and the possession of
J the shops in question has been handed over to Ms. Sonia Vaid. It is further, submitted that civil suits have already been withdrawn by the petitioner
_ Surender Kumar Jain.
Keeping in mind the totality of circumstances, it is ordered that in case of arrest, petitioners be released on anticipatory^ bail, subject to their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ^20,000/-(Rupees Twenty
,, Thousand Only) each with one surety each of the like, amount to the satisfaction ofthe Investigation Officer/Arresting Officer/SHb concerned.
Both the bail applications are disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
A.K^VATHAK, J.
NOVEMBER 10,2016 ^ rb . ^ /
JUDGMENT