Ramesh Chandra & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 15 Nov 2016 · 2016:DHC:9046
Mukta Gupta
CRL.M.C. 2563/2016
2016:DHC:9046
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed three criminal miscellaneous petitions for non-prosecution due to the absence of petitioners' counsel.

Full Text
Translation output
$-19-21 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 2563/2016 & Crl.M.A. 11018/2016
RAMESH CHANDRA & ORS.
Petitioner Represented by: None
VERSUS
STATE & ANR.
Respondent Representedby: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP.
CRL.M.C. 2606/2016 & Crl.M.A. 11151/2016
UNITECHLTD.
VERSUS
STATE & ANR.
Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP.
CRL.M.C. 2647/2016 & Crl.M.A. 11326/2016
MINOTIBAHRI
VERSUS
STATE & ANR Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP.
CRL.M.C. Nos. 2563/2016, 2606/2016 & 2647/2016 page 1 of2
2016:DHC:9046 H
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
15.11.2016 Even on pass-over learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
Petitions and applications are dismissed for non-prosecution.
MUKTA (/UPTA, J.
NOVEMBER 15,2016 'ga' CRL.M.C. Nos. 2563/2016, 2606/2016& 2647/2016 page 2 of2
2016:DHC:9046
JUDGMENT