Madhu Chona v. The Chairman & Anr

Delhi High Court · 23 Nov 2016 · 2016:DHC:7603
Hima Kohli
W.P.(C) 11073/2016
2016:DHC:7603
constitutional petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue other civil or criminal remedies, dismissing the petition as withdrawn.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 11073/2016 and CM APPL. 43299/2016
MADHU CHONA ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Kamlesh Mahajan, Advocate
VERSUS
THE CHAIRMAN & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Mahima Bahl and Mr. Sumant Bhushan, Advocate for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI O R D E R 23.11.2016
JUDGMENT

1. Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition while reserving the right of her client to seek her remedies against the respondent No.2 on the civil and/or criminal sides, as may be permissible in law.

2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn alongwith the pending application. HIMA KOHLI, J NOVEMBER 23, 2016 rkb/ap