Full Text
Translation output
\/ HIGH COURT OF DELHI BAIL XpPLN. 2668/2016 & Crl.M.(Bail)No! 2276/2016 (Interim
Bail) \ ' ' / DEEPAK . . ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Amit Singhj Advocate (1.
Bail) \ ' ' / DEEPAK . . ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Amit Singhj Advocate (1.
VERSUS
■ .
,STATE (NCT OFDELHI) . Respondent
Through: Mr.PannaLai Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with
' DCPMr. (Dr.) A.K. Singla, AdditionalDCP-ShriDevender
Arya,Inspector Sanjeev Kuihar/SHO
Police StationHarsh Vihar,Inspector ■
Jaswant,Police StationHarsh Vihar, Sub-Inspector Samrat, ASlBhola
^ Ram,Police StationHarsh Vihar, Delhi.
,STATE (NCT OFDELHI) . Respondent
Through: Mr.PannaLai Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with
' DCPMr. (Dr.) A.K. Singla, AdditionalDCP-ShriDevender
Arya,Inspector Sanjeev Kuihar/SHO
Police StationHarsh Vihar,Inspector ■
Jaswant,Police StationHarsh Vihar, Sub-Inspector Samrat, ASlBhola
^ Ram,Police StationHarsh Vihar, Delhi.
CORAM:
HON'BLEMR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
23.12.2016 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner asserts that the accused in the present case is juvenile and Section 438 of Cr.
P.O. does not apply. He therefore, requests to withdraw the present petition withliberty to avail the remedies available under the Juvenile
Justice Act. ^ , In view of the aforesaid stand taken on behalf of the petitioner^ the present application is dismissed as withdrawn withTiberty^ as prayedfof. ; ; .
/ : ' p.sprEH,-^j DECEMBER 23,2016 pkb 2016:DHC:8766
23.12.2016 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner asserts that the accused in the present case is juvenile and Section 438 of Cr.
P.O. does not apply. He therefore, requests to withdraw the present petition withliberty to avail the remedies available under the Juvenile
Justice Act. ^ , In view of the aforesaid stand taken on behalf of the petitioner^ the present application is dismissed as withdrawn withTiberty^ as prayedfof. ; ; .
/ : ' p.sprEH,-^j DECEMBER 23,2016 pkb 2016:DHC:8766
JUDGMENT