Full Text
Translation output
6^ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RFA(OS) 69/2016
TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA Appellant Represented by: Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with Ms.Vaishali Mittal, Mr.Siddhant Chamola, Ms.D.Neha Reddy, Advocates
RFA(OS) 69/2016
TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA Appellant Represented by: Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with Ms.Vaishali Mittal, Mr.Siddhant Chamola, Ms.D.Neha Reddy, Advocates
VERSUS
PRIUS AUTO INDUSTRIES & ORS Respondents Represented by: Mrs.Pratibha M.Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by
Ms.Archana Sahadeva, Mr.Kapil Midha, Advocates
Ms.Archana Sahadeva, Mr.Kapil Midha, Advocates
RFA(OS) 62/2016
PRIUS AUTO INDUSTRIES LTD & ORS Appellants Represented by: Mrs.Pratibha M.Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by
Ms.Archana Sahadeva, Mr.Kapil Midha, Advocates
PRIUS AUTO INDUSTRIES LTD & ORS Appellants Represented by: Mrs.Pratibha M.Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by
Ms.Archana Sahadeva, Mr.Kapil Midha, Advocates
VERSUS
TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA Respondent Represented by: Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with Ms.Vaishali Mittal, Mr.Siddhant Chamola, Ms.D.Neha Reddy, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
RFA(OS) 69/2016 & RFA(OS) 62/2016 page 1of2
2017:DHC:8960-DB
ORDER o/o 12.01.2017
2017:DHC:8960-DB
ORDER o/o 12.01.2017
JUDGMENT
1. In view of the judgment dated December 23, 2016 the inevitable consequences has to be the RFA(OS) 62/2016 being allowed and RFA(OS) 69/2016 being dismissed.
2. We accordingly dispose of RFA(OS) 62/2016 setting aside the impugned decree awarding damages and costs against the appellant and in favour ofthe respondent.
3. The suit filed by the respondent is dismissed.
4. As regards RFA(OS) 69/2016 wherein the respondent seeks enhancement of damages the same is dismissed.
5. Parties shall bear their own costs all throughout. ra^UOG, PRADEEP NAI YOGESH KHANNA, J JANUARY 12, 2017 skb RFA(OS) 69/2016 &RFA(OSj 62/2016 • page[2] of[2] J