Full Text
Translation output
$-31 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL)111/2017
SMT BABLI DEVI Petitioner
Through Mr.J.S. Arya,Advocate
W.P.(CRL)111/2017
SMT BABLI DEVI Petitioner
Through Mr.J.S. Arya,Advocate
VERSUS
STATE(NCT OF DELHI)& ORS Respondents
Through Mr,Rahul Mehra,Standing Counsel with Mr.Tushar Saanu,Advocate for the State along with Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, SHO,P.S.Subhash Place.
Through Mr,Rahul Mehra,Standing Counsel with Mr.Tushar Saanu,Advocate for the State along with Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, SHO,P.S.Subhash Place.
W.P.(CRL)3352/2016
POOJA & ANR Petitioners
Through Petitioners in person
POOJA & ANR Petitioners
Through Petitioners in person
VERSUS
STATE & ORS
Through Respondents Mr.Rahul Mehra,Standing Counsel with
Mr.Tushar Saanu,Advocate for the State along with Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, SHO,P.S.Subhash Place.
Mr.J.S. Arya,Advocate for R-4 and 5.
Through Respondents Mr.Rahul Mehra,Standing Counsel with
Mr.Tushar Saanu,Advocate for the State along with Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, SHO,P.S.Subhash Place.
Mr.J.S. Arya,Advocate for R-4 and 5.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
16.01.2017 W.P.(CrI.)No.l11/2017 has been filed by the petitioner, mother ofPooja who was missing since 02.11.2016. Notice was issued in this matter. This
Court was informed by Mr. Mehra, learned Standing Counsel that Pooja has married Amrender on 03.11.2016 and,in fact,Pooja and Amrender have filed a petition being W.P.(Crl.)3352/2016 seeking protection, in which while issuing notice protection has been granted to the married couple. We had directed production of Amrender and Pooja and also called for the file of W.P.(Crl.)
3352/2016.
Amrender and Pooja are present in Court. Pooja submits that she has
2017:DHC:8588-DB / married Amrender out ofher own free will, without any force or coercion. We had passed over the matter to enable the petitioner to meet her daughter Pooja.
At the second call, petitioner submits that she has met her daughter and she is satisfied that Pooja has married out ofher own free will. Petitioner submits that her family and she have no objection to the marriage. She further submits that she had received threatening calls from Amrender and his family members, which is disputed by Amrender. Amrender submits that the petitioner and her family members had been making threatening calls to him. Both the parties agree that they would live in peace and harmony and would not make any threatening calls to each other in future.
The statements made are taken on record. In view of the statements made,the petition being W.P.(Crl.)111/2017 is dismissed as not pressed.
W.P. (Crl.) 3352/2016 was filed by Pooja and her husband seeking protection after their marriage which was solemnised against the wishes ofthe parents ofPooja. They submit that as family of Pooja have now accepted the marriage,they do not wish to press the present petition.
In view ofthe statement made,W.P.(Crl).3352/2016 is also disposed of.
However, mobile number of the beat Constable would continue to be provided to Pooja and Amrender till they are satisfied that there is no threat perception.
The date of10.02.2017fixed in W.P.(Crl).3352/2016 is cancelled.
G.S.SISTANM VINOD GOEL,J JANUARY 16, 2017
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
16.01.2017 W.P.(CrI.)No.l11/2017 has been filed by the petitioner, mother ofPooja who was missing since 02.11.2016. Notice was issued in this matter. This
Court was informed by Mr. Mehra, learned Standing Counsel that Pooja has married Amrender on 03.11.2016 and,in fact,Pooja and Amrender have filed a petition being W.P.(Crl.)3352/2016 seeking protection, in which while issuing notice protection has been granted to the married couple. We had directed production of Amrender and Pooja and also called for the file of W.P.(Crl.)
3352/2016.
Amrender and Pooja are present in Court. Pooja submits that she has
2017:DHC:8588-DB / married Amrender out ofher own free will, without any force or coercion. We had passed over the matter to enable the petitioner to meet her daughter Pooja.
At the second call, petitioner submits that she has met her daughter and she is satisfied that Pooja has married out ofher own free will. Petitioner submits that her family and she have no objection to the marriage. She further submits that she had received threatening calls from Amrender and his family members, which is disputed by Amrender. Amrender submits that the petitioner and her family members had been making threatening calls to him. Both the parties agree that they would live in peace and harmony and would not make any threatening calls to each other in future.
The statements made are taken on record. In view of the statements made,the petition being W.P.(Crl.)111/2017 is dismissed as not pressed.
W.P. (Crl.) 3352/2016 was filed by Pooja and her husband seeking protection after their marriage which was solemnised against the wishes ofthe parents ofPooja. They submit that as family of Pooja have now accepted the marriage,they do not wish to press the present petition.
In view ofthe statement made,W.P.(Crl).3352/2016 is also disposed of.
However, mobile number of the beat Constable would continue to be provided to Pooja and Amrender till they are satisfied that there is no threat perception.
The date of10.02.2017fixed in W.P.(Crl).3352/2016 is cancelled.
G.S.SISTANM VINOD GOEL,J JANUARY 16, 2017
W.P.(CRL)111/2017 2/2
2017:DHC:8588-DB
2017:DHC:8588-DB
JUDGMENT