Dr. Sakshi Malik v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

Delhi High Court · 18 Jan 2017 · 2017:DHC:8407
Mukta Gupta
BAIL APPLN.2601/2016
2017:DHC:8407
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail petitions as withdrawn, directing the petitioners to file fresh applications before the Court of first instance for decision in accordance with law.

Full Text
Translation output
V. &9 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN.2601/2016 ^
DR.SAKSHI MALIK ' Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Kirti Uppal,Sr. Adv.with
Mr.Harsh Kumar,Adv.
VERSUS
THE STATE(NCT OF DELHI) Respondent Represented by: Mr.Ravi Nayak,APP with
SHO Akash Rawat,PS NDRS.
BAIL APPLN.2602/2016
DR.HEMENDRAPAL SINGH Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Kirti Uppal,Sr. Adv.with
Mr.Harsh Kumar,Adv.
VERSUS
THE STATE(NCT OF DELHI) Respondent Represented by: Mr.Ravi Nayak,APP with
SHO Akash Rawat,PS NDRS.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
18.01.2017 The petitioners filed anticipatory bail applications before the learned
Trial Court which have been withdrawn with liberty to file fresh one. Thus, there is no order on merits against them. The petitioners seek leave to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, which is the Court of first instance for grantofanticipatory bail.
Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
2017:DHC:8407 Needless to state that if applications for anticipatory bail are filed by the petitioners, the same will be decided in accordance with law and the facts and circumstances ofthe case. fM4Ui
MUKTA GUPTA,J.
JANUARY 18,2017 'v mittal' 2017:DHC:8407
JUDGMENT